2020
DOI: 10.1364/ol.380442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-spatial-resolution fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensor based on Φ-OFDR with enhanced crosstalk suppression

Abstract: A high-sensitivity and high-spatial-resolution distributed acoustic sensor based on phase-sensitive optical frequency domain reflectometry ( Φ -OFDR) is proposed. The vibration information is retrieved from the phase change of the complex Rayleigh backscattering. Inner-pulse division and rotating-vector-sum methods are employed to overcome the fading problem and to suppress the crosstalk along the fiber. For the first time, to the best of our knowledge, the waveforms of two simultaneous kilo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensor presented a standard deviation of ~0.1 rad (corresponding to ~100 nε ) after fading suppression. This result implies a performance closer to the one demonstrated here but with a much higher detection bandwidth 44 . The two experimental demonstrations developed in this work showed spatial resolutions <4 cm, acoustic samplings up to 40 Hz and a range up to 1 km.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sensor presented a standard deviation of ~0.1 rad (corresponding to ~100 nε ) after fading suppression. This result implies a performance closer to the one demonstrated here but with a much higher detection bandwidth 44 . The two experimental demonstrations developed in this work showed spatial resolutions <4 cm, acoustic samplings up to 40 Hz and a range up to 1 km.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…axis 1 GHz (external modulation) Pulse-coding ΦOTDR 18 2.5 cm ~0.1 rad (~0.4 με @ 2.5 cm) 500 m 122 kHz ~4 GHz 2 PD per pol. axis 4 GHz (external modulation) OFDR 42 20 cm ~0.4 rad (200 με @ 20 cm) 30 m 50 Hz ~MHz Multiple detection stages ~5 THz (tuneable laser source) a OFDR 43 10 cm ~1 rad (~1 με @ 10 cm) 200 m 300 Hz ~5 MHz Multiple detection stages ~2.5 THz (tuneable laser source) a OFDR 44 12 cm ~0.1 rad (~100 με @ 10 cm) 950 m 6.25 kHz ~1 GHz 1 PD per pol. axis 8 GHz (external modulation) TE-ΦOTDR (proposed in this work) 2 cm 0.09 rad (~490 με @ 2 cm) 200 m 20 Hz <1 MHz 1 PD per pol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the high-resolution mode (mm), the attainable sensitivity is reduced (see Table 1 ). Other solutions with cm spatial resolution offer better sensitivity at the expense of reducing the number of sensing points and acoustic sampling [ 30 ] or increasing notably the photodetector bandwidth [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial resolution is inversely proportional to the frequency sweep range, which can reach the sub-millimeter scale [17]. Recent developments of OFDR for DAS have focused on increasing the sweep repetition rate [18], decreasing the computational complexity [16] [19], and suppressing crosstalk among sensors [20]. A bandwidth of more than a kilohertz was achieved using several different OFDR methods [18,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%