2016
DOI: 10.1002/2015ja022235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High spatial resolution radar observations of ultralow frequency waves in the southern polar cap

Abstract: We present an analysis of ultralow frequency (ULF) waves detected in the southern polar cap using the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN). These waves manifest as quasi‐sinusoidal oscillations in the Doppler velocity, which arise due to the oscillating ULF wave electric field in the F region ionosphere. The event reported in this study occurred during the southern polar winter under quiet geomagnetic conditions. The 1.1–1.3 mHz oscillations were observed throughout the polar cap by the McMurdo, Dome C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An outstanding issue is how Pc5 waves are generated in the cusp and polar cap region on open field lines. The polar cap has generally been thought to be a quiet region, with wave power entering only from neighboring regions, such as the auroral oval (e.g., Bland & McDonald, 2016). As summarized in Engebretson et al (2006) Pc5 waves from very high latitudes can be categorized into three classes according to their potential sources: cusp-related waves (Posch et al, 2016), polar pulsations extended from the auroral region, and Pi cap 3 independent of cusp and auroral pulsations (Yagova et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An outstanding issue is how Pc5 waves are generated in the cusp and polar cap region on open field lines. The polar cap has generally been thought to be a quiet region, with wave power entering only from neighboring regions, such as the auroral oval (e.g., Bland & McDonald, 2016). As summarized in Engebretson et al (2006) Pc5 waves from very high latitudes can be categorized into three classes according to their potential sources: cusp-related waves (Posch et al, 2016), polar pulsations extended from the auroral region, and Pi cap 3 independent of cusp and auroral pulsations (Yagova et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An outstanding issue is how Pc5 waves are generated in the cusp and polar cap region on open field lines. The polar cap has generally been thought to be a quiet region, with wave power entering only from neighboring regions, such as the auroral oval (e.g., Bland & McDonald, 2016). As summarized in Engebretson et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed occurrence rate was very different from known geomagnetic Pc5 wave morphology. The existence of ionospheric oscillations in the Pc5/Pi3 band without a ground magnetic response were noticed in (Bland & McDonald, 2016;Kozyreva et al, 2019;Scoular et al, 2013). So far, the mechanisms of these ionospheric fluctuations and their association with geomagnetic pulsations still have not been established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a value is comparable with magnitude of global ULF pulsations, which are resulting from magnetic closed field-line resonance. ULF activity is also observed in the polar caps, but oscillations are specified by lower amplitudes, and the central frequency ~ a few mHz (Bland, 2016). These pulsations are simultaneously seen in geomagnetic and radar data and might be a result of internal processes in the magnetosphere; be directly driven by perturbations in the Solar Wind (SW) or related to substorms (see references from introduction by Bland, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%