2006
DOI: 10.1021/om060534u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Spin and Spin-Crossover Behavior in Monomethylated Bis(indenyl)chromium(II) Complexes

Abstract: Previous work on bis(indenyl)chromium(II) complexes substituted with bulky groups (i-Pr, t-Bu, SiMe 3 ) found that their spin state (S ) 1 or 2) depended on the symmetry of the molecules. Complexes with inversion symmetry (staggered rings) were high-spin; lower symmetry compounds with twisted (gauche) ligands were low spin. The present work explores the effect of methyl group substitution on the indenyl ligand, which leads to complexes possessing either staggered or eclipsed conformations. The monosubstituted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average Mn−C distance of 2.409(3) Å is comparable to those found in high-spin Cp′ 2 Mn complexes such as Cp 2 Mn (2.380(6) Å) and [(Me 3 Si)C 5 H 4 ] 2 Mn (2.375(6) Å) . The slip parameter for the Mn−C distances (Δ Mn−C = 0.14 Å) is substantially larger than that found in bis(indenyl)iron complexes (i.e., Δ Fe−C < 0.07 Å). , It is, however, the same as in η 5 -(1-MeC 9 H 6 ) 2 Cr) and could be considered “distorted η 5 ” . The slippage is not large enough to consider the metal−ring bonding as significantly less than η 5 (as in η 3 -(C 9 H 7 ) 2 Ni, with Δ Ni−C = 0.44 Å).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average Mn−C distance of 2.409(3) Å is comparable to those found in high-spin Cp′ 2 Mn complexes such as Cp 2 Mn (2.380(6) Å) and [(Me 3 Si)C 5 H 4 ] 2 Mn (2.375(6) Å) . The slip parameter for the Mn−C distances (Δ Mn−C = 0.14 Å) is substantially larger than that found in bis(indenyl)iron complexes (i.e., Δ Fe−C < 0.07 Å). , It is, however, the same as in η 5 -(1-MeC 9 H 6 ) 2 Cr) and could be considered “distorted η 5 ” . The slippage is not large enough to consider the metal−ring bonding as significantly less than η 5 (as in η 3 -(C 9 H 7 ) 2 Ni, with Δ Ni−C = 0.44 Å).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…It remains to be seen whether bis(indenyl)manganese(II) complexes are suitable for incorporation into charge transfer complexes. The resulting d 4 Mn(III) centers may be able to replicate some of the rich magnetic behavior observed for their Ind′ 2 Cr(II) counterparts. ,, …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The dimeric complex (indenyl) 3 Cr 2 Cl A and its derivative (indenyl) 4 Cr 2 B are representatives of a chromium species (Figure ). They are available by reduction of chromium­(III) chloride with sodium indenide, followed by gradual substitution of chloride with an indenyl group . Complexes representing palladium are the dimeric species (μ,η 3 -Ind)­(μ-Cl)­Pd 2 (PR 3 ) 2 (R = Cy, Ph) C , which are accessible via a reversible conproportionation of Ind-Pd­(II) and Pd(0)­(PR 3 ) n species .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the most straightforward case, as the molecule is minimally substituted, adopts a staggered conformation in the solid state, and is high spin both in solution and in the solid state at all temperatures. 14 (Ind Me-1 ) 2 Cr. Although the molecule exhibits spin-crossover behavior in the solid state, this is certainly the result of its eclipsed configuration, which is dictated by crystal-packing forces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than the fully methylated complex, 11 the only attempt to prepare a complex with substitution on the benzo portion led to the isolation of the dinuclear (Ind Me-4 ) 3 Cr 2 Cl complex. 14 We report here a study of polymethylated Ind′ 2 Cr complexes that further illuminates the interrelationship among ligand conformation, electron donation, and substitution patterns on the magnetic properties of the compounds. Such knowledge is valuable in the pursuit of tunable magnetism in systems such as charge-transfer salts 15 and in predicting and controlling metal center reactivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%