“…nitinol alloy), SMPs have attracted tremendous interest due to their dramatically larger recovery strain (up to 800 per cent vs less than 8 per cent), light weight, low cost, good processability and biocompatibility (Behl et al , 2010a; Yakacki and Gall, 2009; Xie, 2011; Habault et al , 2013; Hager et al , 2015). They have been extensively explored for a wide application, for example, heat-shrinkable tubes, reconfigurable morphing wings (Felton et al , 2013; Yakacki, 2013), smart textiles (Leng et al , 2009), sensors and actuators (Sun et al , 2014a, 2014b; Li and Serpe, 2016), self-healing materials (Wang et al , 2012a; Feng et al , 2016), surgical stents and sutures (Lendlein and Langer, 2002; Huang et al , 2013; Jing et al , 2016), deployable structures (Santo et al , 2012; Liu et al , 2014a) and implants for minimally invasive surgery (Yakacki et al , 2007; Liu et al , 2014b). Traditional thermo-responsive shape-memory effect (SME) is usually achieved in the process called “programming”, which makes the material retain a temporary shape for a long period at ambient conditions (Lendlein and Kelch, 2002).…”