High‐tech ventures' innovation and influences of institutional voids

Abstract

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by 405387 [] For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. AbstractPurpose -The purpose of this paper is to investigate how institutional voids influence high-tech ventures' innovation, and what strategies high-tech entrepreneurs deploy to cope with the institutional environments they encounter. Design/methodology/approach -A qualitative research approach was taken. In-depth interviews were conducted with nine high-tech entrepreneurs. In addition, governmental officials, overseas associations, and professional investors were interviewed for more/further observations. Findings -Institutional voids may negatively influence high-tech ventures' innovation. They might be moderated by guanxi and government active involvement. On the contrary, institutional voids can offer high-tech entrepreneurs the opportunity to create innovative business models. The co-evolution of institutional developments and high-tech ventures illustrates the particular characteristics of Chinese entrepreneurial environment. Research limitations/implications -Qualitative study cannot simply be generalized, albeit this explorative study provides illustrative insights. Quantitative research (e.g. surveys), which is applied to test the propositions, calls for further scholarly inquiry. Practical implications -Overseas entrepreneurs are presented with the opportunities to pursue an entrepreneurial career. SMEs from developed economies may join the movement with technology entrepreneurs to enter the Chinese market and co-shape the market development. Originality/value -Institutional voids were conceptualized from a multi-dimensional perspective, namely national, regional, and individual. By providing qualitative evidence, different mechanisms to fill the institutional voids are explored.

Developing the Shanghai online games industry: A multi‐scalar institutional perspective

“…While the research of “old” institutional theories tend to stress a top‐down way of institutional implementation (highlighting the influence of big “structures”), the work on institutional change highlights the agency of individuals and organizations in altering the evolution of institutions at multiple levels (highlighting the role of agencies). Moreover, in the context of developing and emerging economies, where market economies are not sophisticatedly developed (Mair, Marti, & Ventresca, ; Schrammel, ), institutional entrepreneurship and institutional work can also be considered as a reaction to “institutional voids,” which are situations where institutional arrangements that support markets are either absent, weak, or fail to accomplish the role expected of them (Liu, ; Mair & Marti, ).…”

Corporate Sustainability and Green Innovation in an Emerging Economy—An Empirical Study in China

“…Innovative sustainability practices, such as green innovation, may be stifled as decision makers become predisposed to select suboptimal over more optimal choices resulting from an adherence to regulatory standards. Moreover, institutional void may also negatively influence ventures' innovation through the means of guanxi exploitation and active government involvement [68].…”

Patterns in Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital and Private Equity Investments in Brazil

“…Zang (2011), investigating the Chinese VC industry, concluded that in the case of China the geographic concentration of investments is higher than in mature markets because of institutional voids, which amplifies the role of the state in stimulating the development of regional networks of investors and entrepreneurs in order to foster the VC industry and economic growth. Evaluating the case of high-tech companies in China, Liu (2011) notes that the institutional void harms the activity of these companies and that it can be compensated in the case of companies that operate within technological parks, in particular those owned by the State. The absence of incentive policies that regionally foster VC can impair growth in the stock of high-potential companies in regions without VC firms due to the importance of spatial proximity.…”