2000
DOI: 10.1109/20.908808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High temperature 2:17 magnets: relationship of magnetic properties to microstructure and processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
93
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent reports have revealed that the Cu enrichment in the cell boundary phase (SmCo 5 phase) reduces the anisotropy field of the SmCo 5 phase in comparison with that of the Sm 2 Co 17 phase; this eventually results in the high coercivity in Sm(Co,Fe,Cu,Zr) z magnets. 2,13) On the other hand, we have reported that by step aging, the Cu atoms are segregated into the cell boundary phases and the distribution of lines of magnetic flux fluctuates considerably. Some of the experimental results have been published in the previous paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent reports have revealed that the Cu enrichment in the cell boundary phase (SmCo 5 phase) reduces the anisotropy field of the SmCo 5 phase in comparison with that of the Sm 2 Co 17 phase; this eventually results in the high coercivity in Sm(Co,Fe,Cu,Zr) z magnets. 2,13) On the other hand, we have reported that by step aging, the Cu atoms are segregated into the cell boundary phases and the distribution of lines of magnetic flux fluctuates considerably. Some of the experimental results have been published in the previous paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2) Their magnetic properties depend sensitively on the microstructure and magnetic domain structure controlled by the sophisticated and lengthy heat treatments. [3][4][5] For example, by employing the step-aging method, the coercivity and maximum energy product increased drastically from 33 to 749 kA/m and from 20 to 192 kJ/m 3 , respectively, while there was a slight decrease in the remanence from 1.1 to 1.0 T. The high coercivity of Sm(Co,Fe,Cu,Zr) z magnets can be fundamentally explained by the pinning of the domain wall to the nanoscaled cell boundary precipitated in the cellular structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 that there are also temperatures at which . In this case, (3) predicts , but in reality there are chemical concentration fluctuations [10], so that the material is never truly homogeneous.…”
Section: Origin Of the Positive Temperature Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small amount of the third element (i.e. Cu, Zr, Ti, Hf, and Si) can stabilize the Sm-Co phase with the TbCu 7 -type structure [6][7][8][9][10]. Hence, Cu and Zr were doped as the third elements to stabilize the SmCo 7 -type phase in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Sm 2 Co 17 -type alloys have shortcomings of a low intrinsic coercivity and low operating temperature [8] whereas the disadvantages of the SmCo 5 -type alloys are their relatively lower Curie temperature and magnetic moment [9]. In comparison, the Sm(Co,M) 7 (M = stabilizing element) compounds with the TbCu 7 -type structure (space group P6/mmm) possess a higher predicted Curie temperature, a high magnetic anisotropy field, and a low intrinsic coercivity temperature coefficient [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%