2006
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2006.304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-throughput and sensitive assay to measure yeast cell growth: a bench protocol for testing genotoxic agents

Abstract: Intracellular metabolites and environmental agents continuously challenge the structural integrity of DNA. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the complete collection of open reading frame deletion mutants, in combination with powerful screening methods, allows for the comprehensive analyses of cellular responses to insult. We have developed a protocol to determine the sensitivity of growing yeast to DNA-damaging agents that is based on automatic measurements of the optical density of very small (100 microl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Growth of each treatment was measured by optical density (OD 600 ) every 15 min for 23 h using an automated microplate reader (for culture details see electronic supplementary material). We used the R package grofit [35] to estimate two parameters used to compare population growth rates: the length of the lag phase (l) and the cell doubling time [36].…”
Section: (D) Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growth of each treatment was measured by optical density (OD 600 ) every 15 min for 23 h using an automated microplate reader (for culture details see electronic supplementary material). We used the R package grofit [35] to estimate two parameters used to compare population growth rates: the length of the lag phase (l) and the cell doubling time [36].…”
Section: (D) Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haploid double mutants (yfegts-URA3 bud23Δ::KanMX) were then assayed for genetic interaction by comparing the growth of the double mutant with the parental single mutants. The doubling times and growth curves for each strain were generated as described (Toussaint and Conconi 2006). We scored neutral genetic interactions as having the fitness predicted by the product of the fitness of individual mutants.…”
Section: Genetic Interactions Of Bud23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For quantification of genetic interactions, cells were cultured in 100 ”L of YPD containing 75 ”g/mL Ampicillin in 96-well plates by shaking continuously for 36 h in a microplate reader (Powerwave; Biotek). The doubling times were calculated from growth curves as described (Toussaint and Conconi 2006). The fitness of each strain was calculated as the ratio of the doubling time of the wild type to that of the mutant (Dixon et al 2009).…”
Section: Construction Of Strains For the Genetic Screenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For expediency, we screened compounds on 96-well plates using optical density as an index of growth recovery, as described for yeasts (27). Growth of Vpr-expressing yeast in the presence or absence of small molecules was measured spectrophotometrically and plotted as percentage growth (with the growth recovery of yeast in the presence of 1, our positive control in the screen, expressed as 100%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%