1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1367-5931(97)80078-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-throughput screening: advances in assay technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
85
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In high-throughput enzyme inhibition assays, more than a million compounds are usually tested for their ability to inactivate the target enzyme. Often the process involves two consecutive screens [1,2]. The first screen identifies compounds that inhibit the enzymatic activity and is usually performed at a single compound concentration.…”
Section: B S T R a C Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In high-throughput enzyme inhibition assays, more than a million compounds are usually tested for their ability to inactivate the target enzyme. Often the process involves two consecutive screens [1,2]. The first screen identifies compounds that inhibit the enzymatic activity and is usually performed at a single compound concentration.…”
Section: B S T R a C Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, miniaturisation of assays leads to a series of key challenges, reviewed by a range of authors late in the 20th century (Hertzberg and Pope 2000, Sittampalam et al 1997, Silverman et al 1998, Lemmo et al 1998 such as (i) assay methods and detection, (ii) liquid handling and robotics and (iii) process flow and information management. It is the second challenge for which inkjet printing was identified as a potentially important tool (Blanchard et al 1996, Lemmo et al 1997, Sittampalam et al 1997, Burbaum et al 1997, Lemmo et al 1998, Oldenburg et al 1998, Schena et al 1998, Rose 1999, Dunn and Feygin 2000, Bellavance et al 2000, Taylor et al 2002.…”
Section: High Throughput 'System Discovery' Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the second challenge for which inkjet printing was identified as a potentially important tool (Blanchard et al 1996, Lemmo et al 1997, Sittampalam et al 1997, Burbaum et al 1997, Lemmo et al 1998, Oldenburg et al 1998, Schena et al 1998, Rose 1999, Dunn and Feygin 2000, Bellavance et al 2000, Taylor et al 2002. The key features of inkjet that lend themselves to the liquid handling challenges of micro-array technologies are (i) noncontact deposition with a significant stand-off distance, ensuring that the size of the well is no longer limited by the size of the dosing nozzle, (ii) repeatability and accuracy of inkjet-deposited drops once their formation is optimised, (iii) accurate control of both individual drop volumes and total volumes by waveform and print signal controls, (iv) low reservoir volume requirements and (v) minimal space requirements for the system.…”
Section: High Throughput 'System Discovery' Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to SPA assays,¯uores-cence-based assays using FRET (Stryer, 1978) or uorescence polarization (FP) have been the most common solution to this problem (Silverman et al, 1998;Sittampalam et al, 1997). FRET is a process that occurs when a donor¯uorescent molecule has an emission wavelength that overlaps the absorption wavelength of an acceptor.…”
Section: Simplified`mix and Read' Homogeneous Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%