2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High throughput screening for membrane process development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, screening optimal process conditions can be time-consuming and tedious (as mentioned in Part I). Miniaturization and automation are bringing new tools and strategies to biotech process development for production of therapeutic proteins [10][11][12]. This protocol describes creation of a high-throughput process development (HTPD) approach using membrane chromatography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, screening optimal process conditions can be time-consuming and tedious (as mentioned in Part I). Miniaturization and automation are bringing new tools and strategies to biotech process development for production of therapeutic proteins [10][11][12]. This protocol describes creation of a high-throughput process development (HTPD) approach using membrane chromatography.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Chandler and Zydney have described one approach to this problem [23]. They used a custom manifold designed to connect individual wells of a standard 96-well filter plate to a sealed and pressurised solution reservoir.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that the 1 00 UEAV A cartridge performance is within 10% of the 10 00 UEAV cartridge, compared with 41% for the flat-sheet disc. Whilst the 25 mm diameter flat-sheet discs used in these experiments were smaller than the standard 47 mm discs, it was not anticipated that the smaller area would lead to an increase in the degree of variability in performance that have been reported with other small diameter discs (Chandler and Zydney, 2004;Jackson et al, 2006). This was indeed seen to be the case, as the variability in performance was relatively low and did not impact upon the performance prediction that could be made with the flat-sheet disc.…”
Section: Volume Throughput Predictions For Protein Solution Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Other studies (Chandler and Zydney, 2004;Jackson et al, 2006) have previously shown measurable differences in the performance of membrane taken from different locations within a manufactured roll. Thus it may be expected that reduced pleat levels lead to an increase in experimental variation.…”
Section: Effect Of Number and Distribution Of Membrane Pleats On Perfmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation