2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9002(01)01390-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higher-order statistics from NMIS to measure neutron and gamma ray cross talk in plastic scintillators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The source-photon-neutron signature is an especially interesting signature to look at because it is highly resistant to cross talk interference (37), and because the difference between DU and tungsten is significant. Overall, there is a clear and significant difference between the DU and tungsten in most signatures.…”
Section: Exploration Of Signatures In Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source-photon-neutron signature is an especially interesting signature to look at because it is highly resistant to cross talk interference (37), and because the difference between DU and tungsten is significant. Overall, there is a clear and significant difference between the DU and tungsten in most signatures.…”
Section: Exploration Of Signatures In Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In active measurements, 252 Cf sources-driven correlation measurement method is a popular one [12,13]. Based on this method, ORNL (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) had designed a nuclear material identification system (NMIS) aiming to verify the fissile material [14][15][16]. This method has been used successfully in the past to identify various uranium components, but nearly all of them focused on mass and enrichment [7,[17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory underlying the mass reconstruction assumes neutrons are only counted once, which is a correct assumption for 3 He tubes. However, because fast neutrons can scatter multiple times between scintillators [5,6,7,8] and register artificially correlated counts, this traditional moment method unfortunately fails for scintillators. Using modified expressions for the moment method to theoretically account for multiple scattering, it was shown [9,10] that the calculated fractions of neutrons scattering multiple times can be used to apply corrections to the masses of nuclear materials undergoing fission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%