Higher risk of death from COVID-19 in low-income and non-White populations of São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

IntroductionLittle evidence exists on the differential health effects of COVID-19 on disadvantaged population groups. Here we characterise the differential risk of hospitalisation and death in São Paulo state, Brazil, and show how vulnerability to COVID-19 is shaped by socioeconomic inequalities.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using hospitalised severe acute respiratory infections notified from March to August 2020 in the Sistema de Monitoramento Inteligente de São Paulo database. We examined the risk of hospitalisation and death by race and socioeconomic status using multiple data sets for individual-level and spatiotemporal analyses. We explained these inequalities according to differences in daily mobility from mobile phone data, teleworking behaviour and comorbidities.ResultsThroughout the study period, patients living in the 40% poorest areas were more likely to die when compared with patients living in the 5% wealthiest areas (OR: 1.60, 95% CI 1.48 to 1.74) and were more likely to be hospitalised between April and July 2020 (OR: 1.08, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.12). Black and Pardo individuals were more likely to be hospitalised when compared with White individuals (OR: 1.41, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.46; OR: 1.26, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.28, respectively), and were more likely to die (OR: 1.13, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.19; 1.07, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.10, respectively) between April and July 2020. Once hospitalised, patients treated in public hospitals were more likely to die than patients in private hospitals (OR: 1.40%, 95% CI 1.34% to 1.46%). Black individuals and those with low education attainment were more likely to have one or more comorbidities, respectively (OR: 1.29, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.39; 1.36, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.45).ConclusionsLow-income and Black and Pardo communities are more likely to die with COVID-19. This is associated with differential access to quality healthcare, ability to self-isolate and the higher prevalence of comorbidities.

Men are the main COVID-19 transmitters: behavior or biology?

“…COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant number of deaths worldwide, but the prevalence of comorbidities [ 7 , 8 ], lower education levels, socioeconomic inequalities as the healthcare system inexperience to deal with the pandemic [ 9 , 10 ] contributed to the increase of COVID-19 cases and deaths in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [ 11 – 13 ]. Most of these countries still show inadequate vaccination programs, lack of an accurate and rapid diagnosis as well as poor viral surveillance [ 10 , 14 – 16 ], contributing for the emergence of COVID-19 waves and new SARS-CoV-2 variants [ 17 , 18 ].…”

Tracking the emergence of disparities in the subnational spread of COVID-19 in Brazil using an online application for real-time data visualisation: a longitudinal analysis

“…A study using data aggregated at the country level from the 5 BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, China, India and South Africa) showed that COVID-19 case numbers were associated with increasing levels of poverty 48 . Other studies have shown that COVID-19 mortality rates were greater in areas of Brazil with lower levels of various socio-economic indicators 49,50 . Possible explanations for the differences with our findings are that we focussed on the early stages of the local epidemic (time to arrival and early rate of propagation) and also that we were comparing trends between municipalities within one country.…”

Subjective Well-Being in Times of Covid-19: Positivity Bias

“…We hypothesized that life satisfaction, happiness and quality of life would be lower during the COVID-19 pandemic than before the pandemic and that the evaluation would become worse from 2020 to 2021. We also expected to find interaction between the well-being evaluations and the respondents' family income, since there is higher risk of death from COVID-19 among the poorest (Li et al, 2021). The number of deaths in Brazil was one of the highest in the world.…”