2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2017.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly differentiated magmas linked with polymetallic mineralization: A case study from the Cuihongshan granitic intrusions, Lesser Xing'an Range, NE China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This inference is reinforced by our molybdenite Re‐Os ages (~261 Ma). Moreover, based on detailed microscopic observation, the vermicular texture broadly distributed in the muscovite porphyritic granite occurring as detached “drops” with no preferred orientation (Figure 3g) belong to the myrmekite texture (Fei et al, 2018). The myrmekite texture indicates a subsolidus reaction during magmatic‐hydrothermal transition (Fei et al, 2018; Yuguchi & Nishiyama, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This inference is reinforced by our molybdenite Re‐Os ages (~261 Ma). Moreover, based on detailed microscopic observation, the vermicular texture broadly distributed in the muscovite porphyritic granite occurring as detached “drops” with no preferred orientation (Figure 3g) belong to the myrmekite texture (Fei et al, 2018). The myrmekite texture indicates a subsolidus reaction during magmatic‐hydrothermal transition (Fei et al, 2018; Yuguchi & Nishiyama, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, based on detailed microscopic observation, the vermicular texture broadly distributed in the muscovite porphyritic granite occurring as detached “drops” with no preferred orientation (Figure 3g) belong to the myrmekite texture (Fei et al, 2018). The myrmekite texture indicates a subsolidus reaction during magmatic‐hydrothermal transition (Fei et al, 2018; Yuguchi & Nishiyama, 2007). All above lines confirm that the late stage (Middle Permian ~260 Ma) of muscovite porphyritic granite induced the formation of the deposit rather than the Early Permian magmatic events as previous suggested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…scheelite deposit (249.4 Ma)(Zhao, 2014), Cuihongshan W-Mo-Pb-Zn-(Fe-Cu) ore district (Liu, 2009;Shao et al 2011;Hu et al 2014;Fei et al 2018), Gongpengzi Cu-Zn-W polymetallic ore district (173.28 and 173.46 Ma) (Li, Y. S. et al 2019), Xing'antun W-Mo ore district (195.4 Ma) (Wang et al 2019), Sanjiazi scheelite ore district (172.4 Ma) (Ren et al 2009) and Baishilizi W ore district (198.3 Ma) (Zhao, 2014). The W-related intrusive rocks in the NCGB mainly have Early-Middle Jurassic and Late Jurassic -Early Cretaceous ages, including granitoids dominated by monzogranite, quartz monzonite and biotite granite from the Honghuaerji W polymetallic ore district (179.4-178.6 Ma) (Xiang et al 2014; Guo et al 2015), biotite granite and biotite monzogranite from the Shamai W ore district (153.0-139.1 Ma) (Jiang et al 2016; Li et al 2016), granite from the Weilianhe region (143 Ma) (Xiang et al 2018), fine-grained granite, granite porphyry and monzogranite from the Wurinitu region (139.7-131.9 Ma) (Liu et al 2011; Yang et al 2016; Zhang et al 2016), and biotite monzogranite and quartz porphyry from the Dayana W-Mo ore district (135-130 Ma) (Xiang et al 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%