2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly efficient CRISPR-Cas9-mediated editing identifies novel mechanosensitive microRNA-140 targets in primary human articular chondrocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(56 reference statements)
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous gene editing efforts in primary chondrocytes reported a lower gene editing efficiency, reaching 74% efficiency with MMP13 to reduce ECM degradation, [47] or 60% for cell cycle inhibitor p21 to increase ECM deposition, [49] of which only 16% of colonies showed a homozygous deletion. Similar efficiency has only been demonstrated in a recent work targeting miR-140, where 90-98% of editing was reached; [48] yet that required two sgRNAs and double transfection, conditions that might enhance post-transfection cell toxicity and off-target probability, even if not observed by T7E1 assay. In our editing, we observed a 60% deletion of the first predicted off-target.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous gene editing efforts in primary chondrocytes reported a lower gene editing efficiency, reaching 74% efficiency with MMP13 to reduce ECM degradation, [47] or 60% for cell cycle inhibitor p21 to increase ECM deposition, [49] of which only 16% of colonies showed a homozygous deletion. Similar efficiency has only been demonstrated in a recent work targeting miR-140, where 90-98% of editing was reached; [48] yet that required two sgRNAs and double transfection, conditions that might enhance post-transfection cell toxicity and off-target probability, even if not observed by T7E1 assay. In our editing, we observed a 60% deletion of the first predicted off-target.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The system yielded a high efficiency in production of genome-edited cells across several donors, which was superior to previous attempts. [47][48][49] Next, we characterized the gene expression and matrix deposition of the TAK1-KO chondrocytes exposed to inflammatory stimuli. Then the ability of TAK1-KO chondrocytes to produce good quality cartilage in a hydrogel when exposed to an inflamed environment was assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we developed an RNP gene editing strategy to achieve strikingly high editing efficiency in bulk, generating a chondrocyte cell pool ready for downstream application, without the need for further enrichment. Our KO efficiency is considerably greater than in reported RNP analogous approaches [ 27 , 28 ], and comparable to a recent work published by our group [ 29 ]. RNP delivery ensures transient editing, thereby reducing the risk of off-target effects and immunogenicity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…RNP-based bulk gene editing in primary chondrocytes has been performed to KO matrix metallopeptidase 13 ( MMP13 ), with editing efficiency ranging from 63 to 74% [ 27 ]. Higher editing percentages (~ 90–98%) were achieved only upon delivery of two sgRNAs and a double transfection to target microRNA 140 [ 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, gene editing has been performed using the CRISPR/Cas9 method, in order to silence miR-140-5p/-3p expression in primary OA chondrocytes, without WWP2 expression modulation. This recent development has only been used at this stage to identify miR-140-5p/-3p targets, but opens up great possibilities as a tool to further evaluate the role of miRNAs in AO and to assess potential new therapies [ 109 ].…”
Section: Role Of Mir-140-5p/-3p In Osteoarthritismentioning
confidence: 99%