2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly efficient dynamic modification of plastic microfluidic devices using proteins in microchip capillary electrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Little work has been done on measuring EOF mobility and understanding the surface chemistry of PMMA coated with surfactants. Even though surface modification by polymers and surfactants have been investigated in PMMA microchips , a detailed explanation on the effect of surfactant on EOF at different concentrations has not been presented. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, the effect of mixed surfactants (ionic/nonionic) or a surfactant and a neutral polymer on EOF has not been reported yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little work has been done on measuring EOF mobility and understanding the surface chemistry of PMMA coated with surfactants. Even though surface modification by polymers and surfactants have been investigated in PMMA microchips , a detailed explanation on the effect of surfactant on EOF at different concentrations has not been presented. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, the effect of mixed surfactants (ionic/nonionic) or a surfactant and a neutral polymer on EOF has not been reported yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, little attention has been devoted to examining the reproducibility of the performance of fabricated plastic chips using a dynamic coating [23,24]. In a benchmark paper on numerous plastic materials for hot-embossed CE microchips, Soper et al demonstrated that several physicochemical properties and the associated operational performance must be considered to obtain reproducible electrophoretic separations [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, 40 mg/mL lysozyme in PBS buffer [38] was flushed through the affinity monolith at 2 µL/min for 20 min after antibody immobilization. Then the affinity column was rinsed with deionized water at 5 µL/min for 10 min to wash out any unbound lysozyme.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%