2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9nj05821d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly efficient FeNP-embedded hybrid bifunctional reduced graphene oxide for Knoevenagel condensation with active methylene compounds

Abstract: Novel hybrid bifunctional FeNPs/PPD@rGO for Knoevenagel condensation reaction with 100% conversion and yield.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[31] Though for organic transformations, [43][44] ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) have been established as solitary heterogeneous catalysts however, to the best of our knowledge, only few reports on rGO/ZnO nanocomposites as catalysts have been reported in the literature. [45][46][47] In continuation of our earlier work [48][49][50] , here in we report highly efficient ZnOÀ NPs@r-GO as a proficient heterogeneous catalyst and substantiated through various characterization tools. The accountability of rGO in ZnOÀ NPs@r-GO nanocatalyst is mainly providing tangible support which enhances the mechanical strength of the catalyst and also uniform dispersibility of ZnOÀ NPs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…[31] Though for organic transformations, [43][44] ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) have been established as solitary heterogeneous catalysts however, to the best of our knowledge, only few reports on rGO/ZnO nanocomposites as catalysts have been reported in the literature. [45][46][47] In continuation of our earlier work [48][49][50] , here in we report highly efficient ZnOÀ NPs@r-GO as a proficient heterogeneous catalyst and substantiated through various characterization tools. The accountability of rGO in ZnOÀ NPs@r-GO nanocatalyst is mainly providing tangible support which enhances the mechanical strength of the catalyst and also uniform dispersibility of ZnOÀ NPs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…45 As shown in the Fe 2p core level spectrum (Fig. 2), there are two main peaks at 712.44 eV and 725.78 eV that correspond to the multiplet splitting of high spin Fe 2p 1/2 and Fe 2p 3/2 , 46 which in turn split into two sub-peaks at 710.90 eV, 714.35 eV and 726.21 eV, 728.14 eV due to the difference in Fe oxidation states (Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ ). 45…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…45 As shown in the Fe 2p core level spectrum (Fig. 2), there are two main peaks at 712.44 eV and 725.78 eV that correspond to the multiplet splitting of high spin Fe 2p 1/2 and Fe 2p 3/2 , 46 which in turn split into two sub-peaks at 710.90 eV, 714.35 eV and 726.21 eV, 728.14 eV due to the difference in Fe oxidation states (Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ ). 45 FTIR studies clearly show the difference in spectra between neat g-C 3 N 4 and mesoporous Fe@g-C 3 N 4 nanocatalysts with ratios of 1 : 1, 1 : 3, and 1 : 5, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“… Catalyst Conditions Recovery times Refs FeNPs/PPD@rGO Cat. 0.05 g, Toluene, 40 °C, 3.5 h 6 73 Y 2 ZnO 4 Cat. 0.0136 g, solvent-free, under MW (420 W), 15 min 3 74 CoFe 2 O 4 Cat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%