2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.11.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly efficient nitrogen-doped carbide-derived carbon materials for oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CDC material doped using iron and 1,10-phenanthroline had a much more positive E onset of À32 mV and a E 1/2 of À164 mV, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 which shows the advantage of the porous CDC material. [29] This sample also had the largest oxygen content as determined by XPS. Using the step-wise synthesis procedure with the same amount of MWCNT and CDC yields a catalyst with ORR activity quite similar to that of FeÀNÀCDC-1, which is surprising, given that the activity of the Fe,N-co-doped MWCNTs was much lower than that of the catalyst synthesized using CDC.…”
Section: Electrocatalytic Activity Of Feànàc Catalysts For the Orrmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CDC material doped using iron and 1,10-phenanthroline had a much more positive E onset of À32 mV and a E 1/2 of À164 mV, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 which shows the advantage of the porous CDC material. [29] This sample also had the largest oxygen content as determined by XPS. Using the step-wise synthesis procedure with the same amount of MWCNT and CDC yields a catalyst with ORR activity quite similar to that of FeÀNÀCDC-1, which is surprising, given that the activity of the Fe,N-co-doped MWCNTs was much lower than that of the catalyst synthesized using CDC.…”
Section: Electrocatalytic Activity Of Feànàc Catalysts For the Orrmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This mixture is then pyrolyzed and the substrate along with inactive metal phases is removed by etching in acid mixtures, which allows for control over the porosity and structure by choosing the right substrate and reagents. [29][30][31][32][33] The main advantage of CDCs over other widely-used carbon supports is the amorphous nature and extremely high specific surface area that can be achieved (typically over 2000 m 2 g À1 ) [34] with highly reproducible largescale results already shown. [17] The resulting powder is then pyrolyzed to carbonize the MOF and dope it with transition metals and nitrogen, with the MOF playing a large role in directing the porosity and structure of the resulting catalyst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other case is that the hard‐templates in situ transfer to catalysts as a doping agent. The development of various 3D M−N−C materials is a hot‐topic during these years . 3D M−N−C materials are mainly divided into three typical morphologies including 3D NPs, 3D hollow spheres, and 3D porous structures.…”
Section: D Metal‐nitrogen‐carbon Materials For the Oxygen Reduction mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of various 3D MÀ NÀ C materials is a hot-topic during these years. [144][145][146][147][148] 3D MÀ NÀ C materials are mainly divided into three typical morphologies including 3D NPs, 3D hollow spheres, and 3D porous structures. In addition, 3D carbon materials also have been applied to construct the 3D MÀ NÀ C electrocatalysts, which are similar to the support of CNTs and graphene.…”
Section: D Metal-nitrogen-carbon Materials For the Oxygen Reduction mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, nitrogen‐doped carbon materials, and transition metal (TM)‐N−C (TM=Fe, Co, Cu, etc.) materials have been explored to replace the Pt based electrocatalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%