“…Despite the economic and technological problems related to the production, transport, and storage of hydrogen, the main FCs problem is on a different aspect: the high cost due to the low kinetic of the cathode reaction, the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), and thus, the usage of Pt-based materials as catalysts is still required. − With their low cost, high availability, and good tolerance to poisoning, non-precious-metal catalysts (non-PGM) are the best known alternative to Pt. − During past decades, various non-PGM catalysts were investigated: M–N–C based on M–N x sites, non-precious-metal oxide, chalcogenides, and oxynitrides . The most studied are M–N–C, and among them, the most active metal center is Fe, where iron coordinate from two to five nitrogen functional groups, and among the different types of Fe–N x ( x = 1–5), the metal porphyrin-like Fe–N 4 site is considered the most important for its ORR selectivity and activity. − However, different factors need to be considered to reach good performances, including site density, carbon support hierarchical structure, surface chemistry, graphitization degree, etc. − Choosing the right carbon matrix is the turning point to improve catalytic performance; in fact, the increment of the active SD is per se not enough to enhance the activity, but it is necessary to rationally design the textural and porous properties of the carbon matrix to facilitate the mass transport between micropores and the bulk solution. ,, Moreover, it has been also demonstrated that the incorporation of heteroatoms can influence the catalytic performances . The idea underlying the doping process is the capability of heteroatoms to modulate the electronic structure of the carbon plane via the delocalization of the π-electrons when pinned into the carbon framework, improving the catalyst activity .…”