“…Since this large MR is rare in oxide 2DESs, we summarize the typical MR ratios for different oxide‐based conducting interfaces or surfaces (note that the MR ratio is highly sample‐, temperature‐, and magnetic field‐dependent, we therefore just summarize MR at 8 T below 5 K, which is accessible for most transport facilities), as shown in Figure . It is obvious that the MR ratio of the GAO/STO interface is higher than the other oxide interfaces, including LAO/STO, [ 42,57–63 ] CaZrO 3 /SrTiO 3 (CZO/STO), [ 64,65 ] LaTiO 3 /SrTiO 3 (LTO/STO), [ 66 ] amorphous‐LAO/KTaO 3 (a‐LAO/KTO), [ 43,67 ] Sr 3 Al 2 O 6 /STO (SAO/STO), [ 12 ] extrinsic STO conducting surface, [ 54,68,69 ] and even bulk STO. [ 27,70,71 ] Based on the substantial MR above, a general qualitative picture could be constructed: MR ratio has a close relationship with the mobility.…”