1984
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.81.24.7718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly selective photoaffinity labeling of mu and delta opioid receptors.

Abstract: We report the synthesis and photolabeling properties of two highly selective ligands for ,u and 8 opioidbinding sites: Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-MePhe(pN3)-Gly-ol (AZ-DAMGE) and Tyr-D-Thr-Gly-Phe(pN3)-Leu-Thr (AZ-DTLET). An irreversible inhibition of the electrically induced contractions of mouse vas deferens is caused by irradiation (at 254 nm) of the muscle strip in the presence of AZ-DTLET (1 nM). This phenomenon is antagonized only at large concentrations (10 FM) of naloxone, in accordance with the well-known lower se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only affinity label derivatives of agonists modified in the ‘message’ sequence reported to date have been photoaffinity labels that are derivatives of the enkephalins [i.e. [Phe( p ‐N 3 ) 4 ]DTLET (12) and [Phe( p ‐N 3 ) 4 ]‐DAMGO (12)]. Thus by determining the attachment point of this affinity label derivative to δ receptors, [ d ‐Ala 2 ,Phe( p ‐NCS) 3 ]deltorphin I can provide information on receptor–ligand interactions of the ‘message’ sequence of this amphibian peptide with δ receptors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The only affinity label derivatives of agonists modified in the ‘message’ sequence reported to date have been photoaffinity labels that are derivatives of the enkephalins [i.e. [Phe( p ‐N 3 ) 4 ]DTLET (12) and [Phe( p ‐N 3 ) 4 ]‐DAMGO (12)]. Thus by determining the attachment point of this affinity label derivative to δ receptors, [ d ‐Ala 2 ,Phe( p ‐NCS) 3 ]deltorphin I can provide information on receptor–ligand interactions of the ‘message’ sequence of this amphibian peptide with δ receptors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the potential differences in binding modes between peptides and non‐peptide ligands (3), peptide‐based affinity labels may provide complementary structural information about the binding sites of opioid receptors. Derivatives of opioid peptides containing photoaffinity labels have been reported (12), but the use of these agents has been limited because of the inactivation of opioid receptors by the short wavelength UV light used to generate the reactive intermediates (13). Incorporation of a chloromethylketone at the C‐terminus of [ d ‐Ala 2 ,Leu 5 ]enkephalin produced [ d ‐Ala 2 ,Leu 5 ]enkephalin chloromethylketone (DALECK), which was the first reported opioid peptide‐based electrophilic affinity label (14,15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an alternative strategy, Pap can be conveniently installed into peptides by diazotization of p ‐aminophenylalanine (Apa) in solution after cleavage from the solid support, which has been demonstrated to proceed in the presence of various functional groups. The efficiency of the transformation of Apa into Pap seems to be sequence dependent, yet the specific amino acids responsible for decreasing the conversion could not be identified based on the available literature reports24–33. Furthermore, when Met is present in the peptide sequence, the thioether is expected to undergo oxidation during the diazotization reaction in water24.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the synthesis of enkephalin in NG108-15 cells (Glaser et al, 1981) and the abundance of opioid peptides in the brain should be taken into account when the mechanism for receptor internalization under normal physiological conditions is proposed. Recently developed ligands that bind covalently to the receptors (Klee et al, 1982;Newman and Barnard, 1984;Garbay-Jaureguiberry et al, 1984) should be useful for further analysis of the receptor fate and the possibility of its recycling.…”
Section: Subcellular Fate Of Opiold Receptors 1143mentioning
confidence: 99%