2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2018.07.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly selective, reusable electrochemical impedimetric DNA sensors based on carbon nanotube/polymer composite electrode without surface modification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two main methods for the polymer modification: noncovalent attachment (polymer wrapping and absorption) and covalent attachment ("grafting") [37]. There is a range of studies on the effect of polymer modification on the electrochemical, mechanical, thermal, and rheological properties of CNTs [38][39][40][41]. In addition, polymer modification and hybridization with CNTs have been also actively studied with regard to bio-medical applications, particularly for bio-sensing [42][43][44].…”
Section: Carbon Arc-discharge Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main methods for the polymer modification: noncovalent attachment (polymer wrapping and absorption) and covalent attachment ("grafting") [37]. There is a range of studies on the effect of polymer modification on the electrochemical, mechanical, thermal, and rheological properties of CNTs [38][39][40][41]. In addition, polymer modification and hybridization with CNTs have been also actively studied with regard to bio-medical applications, particularly for bio-sensing [42][43][44].…”
Section: Carbon Arc-discharge Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our impedance analysis showed sensitivity on the femtomolar level, while other measurement methods using gold nanoparticles [27,28] or carbon nanotubes [29,30,31] have reported better sensitivity on the atto or zeptomolar levels. However, such systems have certain drawbacks, such as the requirement to modify a specific ligand on the detection surface, and thus cannot provide comprehensive and continuous measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This electrode was used as the working electrode for the electrochemical DNA sensor. Compared to previous sensors based on pristine MWCNT/PDMS electrodes [27,28], the LOD decreased by approximately 1250 times, from 25 pM to 20 fM. The electrode was stably regenerated by ethanol and water cleaning, which indicated that the physical modification method was highly stable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In these cases, the chemical surface modifications consist of multiple steps that link probe DNA and nanomaterials to the electrode surfaces [24][25][26] and require several reagents. To avoid the complexity of chemical processes, in previous studies, multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)/polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) composite electrodes were fabricated for DNA detection, and MWCNTs were used as the main material for the electrode [27,28]. In contrast to GCE, the electrode can behave as a recognition layer for DNA sensors without chemical modification; in addition, it is flexible and easy to fabricate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%