2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3058575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Sensitive Reflective-Mode Phase-Variation Permittivity Sensor Based on a Coplanar Waveguide Terminated With an Open Complementary Split Ring Resonator (OCSRR)

Abstract: This paper presents a one-port reflective-mode phase-variation microwave sensor consisting of a coplanar waveguide (CPW) transmission line terminated with a grounded open complementary split ring resonator (OCSRR). The sensor is useful for measuring the dielectric constant of the so-called material under test (MUT), which should be placed in contact with the OCSRR, the sensitive element. The output variable is the phase of the reflection coefficient. Design guidelines for the implementation of highly sensitive… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(91 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior can also be expressed in terms of the resonance frequency change, assuming a generic planar sensor with substrate permittivity , whose whole slots are covered by MUT with . Then, can be shown as [ 5 ]: …”
Section: Sensor Design and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This behavior can also be expressed in terms of the resonance frequency change, assuming a generic planar sensor with substrate permittivity , whose whole slots are covered by MUT with . Then, can be shown as [ 5 ]: …”
Section: Sensor Design and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During charging, the catholyte is converted from V 4 + to V 5 + Equation ( 2 ), while the anolyte is converted from V 3 + to V 2 + Equation ( 3 ) [ 5 ]: …”
Section: Vanadium Electrolyte (Mut)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the different possibilities for classification, in a wide application context, the working principle was proposed as the most convenient criterion [48], especially to ease the comparison. This classification yields five kinds of sensors: frequency-variation sensors (e.g., [94,101,102]), phase-variation sensors (e.g., [88,103]), frequency-splitting sensors (e.g., [104,105]), coupling-modulation sensors (e.g., [106][107][108]) and differential-mode sensors (e.g., [90,109,110]). This classification scheme, however, while interesting for a broad application view, might not be the most suitable one for the specific case of glucose sensing.…”
Section: Proposal Of Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of phase-based sensors with SRR-based approaches has been reported in the literature for dielectric properties measurement [103], although this has not been widely applied for glucose sensing. A microfluidic attempt considering a triple SRR design was proposed in [123] for aqueous glucose samples, combined with f r -based measurements.…”
Section: Phase-based Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%