A model is proposed with which the statistics of the fluctuating streamwise velocity in the inner region of wall-bounded turbulent flows are predicted from a measured largescale velocity signature from an outer position in the logarithmic region of the flow. Results, including spectra and all moments up to sixth order, are shown and compared to experimental data for zero-pressure-gradient flows over a large range of Reynolds numbers. The model uses universal time-series and constants that were empirically determined from zero-pressure-gradient boundary layer data. In order to test the applicability of these for other flows, the model is also applied to channel, pipe and adverse-pressure-gradient flows. The results support the concept of a universal inner region that is modified through a modulation and superposition of the large-scale outer motions, which are specific to the geometry or imposed streamwise pressure gradient acting on the flow.
Key words: boundary layers
IntroductionRecently, the authors presented a predictive model for the streamwise velocity statistics in the near-wall region of zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers, where the only input required is a large-scale velocity signature from a wall-normal position further from the wall (Marusic, Mathis & Hutchins 2010b, hereafter referred to as MMH). Here, we show the full details of the model, including the procedures for evaluating the constants and functions that make up the mathematical model, and provide insights into the underlying turbulent boundary layer mechanisms that make up the mathematical formulation. Moreover, new tests have been provided in order to demonstrate the validity and reliability of the model. We also extend the comparison to additional statistics, such as the spectrum across the entire near-wall region, and present all moments up to the sixth order (u 6 ). Furthermore, we extend the comparison of the model to wall-bounded flows different to the zero-pressuregradient case. This addresses a comment by Adrian (2010), in the related Science perspectives article, for the need of future work to evaluate the model 'for flow geometries different from the flat plate'. This has subsequently been done and here we show the comparison of the model with experimental results in channel flow, pipe flow and an adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer.