2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2006.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hill-climbing and branch-and-bound algorithms for exact and approximate inference in credal networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The code is available as a free software tool. 4 In these experiments, the greedy approach described in Sect. 4 is considered and the algorithm is therefore called G-LP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The code is available as a free software tool. 4 In these experiments, the greedy approach described in Sect. 4 is considered and the algorithm is therefore called G-LP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exact approaches have been proposed that implement some branch-and-bound method with local searches [4,6,8,9]. Unfortunately they all suffer from serious efficiency issues unless the credal network is very simple.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the hardness of the problem, some algorithms are known to perform reasonably well under certain conditions. Exact approaches have been proposed that implement some branch-and-bound method with local searches (da Rocha et al, 2003;de Campos and Cozman, 2005;Cano et al, 2007;de Campos and Cozman, 2007). Unfortunately they all suffer from serious efficiency issues unless the credal network is very simple.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, none of these methods can deal well with a binary node having four ternary parents, because this setting is already equivalent to 3 4 = 81 free optimization variables to be chosen, meaning a space of 2 81 possible solutions just locally on this node! On the other hand, approximate methods either are fast and provide no accuracy guarantee (Cano et al, 2007;da Rocha et al, 2003; or provide theoretical guarantees but are as slow as exact methods (Mauá et al, 2012a). Moreover, all these approximate methods are only capable of treating credal networks whose credal sets are specified by enumerating the extreme points, while a constraint-based specification still lacks any practical algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%