2020
DOI: 10.7554/elife.51140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hippocampal remapping as hidden state inference

Abstract: Cells in the hippocampus tuned to spatial location (place cells) typically change their tuning when an animal changes context, a phenomenon known as remapping. A fundamental challenge to understanding remapping is the fact that what counts as a ‘‘context change’’ has never been precisely defined. Furthermore, different remapping phenomena have been classified on the basis of how much the tuning changes after different types and degrees of context change, but the relationship between these variables is not clea… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
83
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
6
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One could imagine that learning would be more likely to generalise if different neurons were activated on each training day (as in our experiments), or even each trial, than if just one pattern was trained for the same duration. Such volatility in the learning environment is indeed thought to change learning dynamics ( Behrens et al, 2007 ; Massi et al, 2018 ; McGuire et al, 2014 ) and by extension may influence the level of generalisation at the neural level, as has recently been suggested for hippocampal representations ( Plitt and Giocomo, 2019 ; Sanders et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…One could imagine that learning would be more likely to generalise if different neurons were activated on each training day (as in our experiments), or even each trial, than if just one pattern was trained for the same duration. Such volatility in the learning environment is indeed thought to change learning dynamics ( Behrens et al, 2007 ; Massi et al, 2018 ; McGuire et al, 2014 ) and by extension may influence the level of generalisation at the neural level, as has recently been suggested for hippocampal representations ( Plitt and Giocomo, 2019 ; Sanders et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This implies an important role for affective input in schema-forming and updates, for both rewarding and aversive experiences (Phelps and LeDoux, 2005 ; Tonegawa et al, 2018 ). Based on Talmi et al ( 2019 ), all naturally related and all affectively similar or similarly intense episodic memories tend to cross-promote each other by semantic (top-down) or by affective (bottom-up) stimuli, which may be objective or based on subjective inference (Sanders et al, 2020 ). The en masse activation may involve either real-time stimuli or may occur internally, by default mode processing which enables a person to time-travel through memories and their associated affects.…”
Section: Neuroscience Of Key Psychoanalytic Postulates About Object Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remapping of hippocampal engrams that encode context and content reflects subjective beliefs about the hidden states of environment (“hidden state inference”), rather than objective, observable properties of the environment (Sanders et al, 2020 ). Hidden states are inferred from observations that are based on and thus also biased by prior experience (safety, danger).…”
Section: Neuroscience Of Psychodynamic Psychotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations