2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459x.2004.030804.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hispanic and Non‐hispanic Responses to Concepts for Four Foods

Abstract: Hispanics and non‐Hispanics Americans participated in four sets of studies dealing with health‐oriented foods, with the goal to identify how they respond to food categories relevant in any cuisine. Each study comprised a conjoint analysis using 36 elements followed by a self‐profiling questionnaire to learn more about Hispanic and non‐Hispanic food responses to concepts for four different product categories (morning bread, bottled water, healthful salad dressing and popcorn as a snack). The study identified pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five articles focused on food store placement (Grier & Davis, 2013;Inagami, Cohen, Finch, & Asch, 2006;Moore, Diez Roux, Nettleton, & Jacobs, 2008;Powell, Auld, Chaloupka, O'Malley, & Johnston, 2007;Rose et al, 2009), of which two focused on fast-food restaurant proximity to schools (Grier & Davis, 2013;Powell et al, 2007) and three focused on grocery/supermarket proximity to households (Inagami et al, 2006;Moore et al, 2008;Rose et al, 2009). Single articles examined these topics: prevalence of Latino actors and the types of ads or products they advertised during children's TV programming (Bang & Reece, 2003), types of health ads appearing in women-oriented magazines (Duerksen et al, 2005), product preferences among Latino and non-Latino consumers (Moskowitz et al, 2004), and 1 Deemed not relevant if the study did not encapsulate the marketing mix or if the article included Latinos but did not include a comparison group. 2 Selected articles must have explicitly compared Latinos with another racial/ethnic or type of marketing group (e.g., Spanish-language television vs. English language television, Bodegas vs. supermarkets, etc.).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Identified Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five articles focused on food store placement (Grier & Davis, 2013;Inagami, Cohen, Finch, & Asch, 2006;Moore, Diez Roux, Nettleton, & Jacobs, 2008;Powell, Auld, Chaloupka, O'Malley, & Johnston, 2007;Rose et al, 2009), of which two focused on fast-food restaurant proximity to schools (Grier & Davis, 2013;Powell et al, 2007) and three focused on grocery/supermarket proximity to households (Inagami et al, 2006;Moore et al, 2008;Rose et al, 2009). Single articles examined these topics: prevalence of Latino actors and the types of ads or products they advertised during children's TV programming (Bang & Reece, 2003), types of health ads appearing in women-oriented magazines (Duerksen et al, 2005), product preferences among Latino and non-Latino consumers (Moskowitz et al, 2004), and 1 Deemed not relevant if the study did not encapsulate the marketing mix or if the article included Latinos but did not include a comparison group. 2 Selected articles must have explicitly compared Latinos with another racial/ethnic or type of marketing group (e.g., Spanish-language television vs. English language television, Bodegas vs. supermarkets, etc.).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Identified Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Product liking is not necessarily a predictor of product purchase. Purchase decisions often employ the evaluation of several product attributes with some product attributes being more important than others (Moskowitz et al. 2004, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conjoint analysis has been applied recently to study food preference and drivers of liking (Moskowitz et al. 2004; Valeeva et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additive constant for the entire panel ( n = 400) was 20, which means that 20% of respondents were interested in the ginseng food products before they were exposed to any elements. Based on previous studies, k 0 < 30 means a low interest in the topic, 30 < k 0 < 50 means a moderate interest and k 0 > 50 means a high interest (Moskowitz et al . 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 shows that utility values for the entire panel ranges from 5.9 to −13.6, which indicate that there were no elements that remarkably drew consumer interest. Generally, utility values above 16 are considered as extremely important elements, 11–15 as very important, 6–10 as significant and relevant, 0–5 as having little impact and below 0 as subtracting interest (Moskowitz et al . 2003, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%