1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1988.tb11663.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histamine‐induced inward currents in cultured endothelial cells from human umbilical vein

Abstract: 1 The membrane response to applied histamine of cultured endothelial cells from human umbilical vein was studied by use of whole cell and single channel patch clamp techniques. A value of -27 + 1.4 mV was found for the resting potential under whole cell current clamp. No voltage-gated currents were seen at either the macroscopic or single channel levels. 2 At holding potentials of -20 to -40 mV, histamine evoked slow rising, long lasting whole cell inward currents. The inward current was associated with depola… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
31
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(54 reference statements)
2
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One is activated by ATP or histamine, and the other is insensitive to these agonists and is defined as the basal non-selective cation current. The non-selective cation current induced by histamine in human umbilical vein (Bregestovski, Bakhramov, Danilov, Moldobaeva & Takeda, 1988;Nilius et al 1993) might be different from the basal non-selective cation current in the present study in terms of the sensitivity to intracellular Ca2+. (Cannell & Sage, 1989;Nilius et al 1993) or in bovine atrial EE cells ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…One is activated by ATP or histamine, and the other is insensitive to these agonists and is defined as the basal non-selective cation current. The non-selective cation current induced by histamine in human umbilical vein (Bregestovski, Bakhramov, Danilov, Moldobaeva & Takeda, 1988;Nilius et al 1993) might be different from the basal non-selective cation current in the present study in terms of the sensitivity to intracellular Ca2+. (Cannell & Sage, 1989;Nilius et al 1993) or in bovine atrial EE cells ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Histamine in the pipette solution was unable to elicit single-channel activity but clearly induced single-channel activity in cell-attached membrane patches if present in the bath solution. Although both extracellular and cytosolic Ca 2+ were necessary for histamine to activate the channel, Bregestovski's experiments 190 allow no unequivocal conclusion with respect to the activation mechanism. These unitary currents have also been observed in the absence of agonist, as has a higher conductance, nonselective cation channel.…”
Section: Agonist-evoked Conductance Changesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, it should also be noted that, although a variety of nonselective cation channels have been described in endothelial cells ( Table Figure 3) have observed a delayed (>30 seconds) increase in inward current that developed after exposure to agonist. Bregestovski et al 190 and, more recently, Nilius and Riemann 193 have described an inward, nonselective cation current evoked by histamine in human umbilical vein endothelial cells, which showed a latency of >60 seconds and was mimicked by application of A23187 (also compare Reference 209). The unitary conductance of 20-26 pS and the reversal potential measurements suggest that the channel is nonselective, although when internal K + was replaced with Na + , only inward currents were observed.…”
Section: Agonist-evoked Conductance Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activation of the non-selective cation channel or current (Bregestovski, Bakhramov, Danilov, Moldobaeva & Takeda, 1988;Adams et al 1989;Nilius, 1990;Nilius & Riemann, 1990) by vasoactive substances has been demonstrated in various tissues. The accompanying paper (Manabe et al 1995) studied the agonist-induced responses of the EE cells, and showed that the membrane was hyperpolarized through the activation of the Ca2+-dependent K+ channels, and concluded that the contribution of the non-selective cation channel should be minor, if any.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%