2020
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histo-molecular differentiation of renal cancer subtypes by mass spectrometry imaging and rapid proteome profiling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue sections

Abstract: Pathology differentiation of renal cancer types is challenging due to tissue similarities or overlapping histological features of various tumor (sub) types. As assessment is often manually conducted outcomes can be prone to human error and therefore require high-level expertise and experience. Mass spectrometry can provide detailed histo-molecular information on tissue and is becoming increasingly popular in clinical settings. Spatially resolving technologies such as mass spectrometry imaging and quantitative … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas more heterogeneous tumor/tissue types showed an increase in classification accuracy of more than 20%, more homogeneous tumor/tissue types only show a slight improvement in classification accuracy . Other researchers conducting tissue classifications with MALDI-MSI have used a variety of strategies to overcome this problem. ,,, We therefore restricted all further analyses to regions that had been identified by a pathologist as tumor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas more heterogeneous tumor/tissue types showed an increase in classification accuracy of more than 20%, more homogeneous tumor/tissue types only show a slight improvement in classification accuracy . Other researchers conducting tissue classifications with MALDI-MSI have used a variety of strategies to overcome this problem. ,,, We therefore restricted all further analyses to regions that had been identified by a pathologist as tumor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Other researchers conducting tissue classifications with MALDI-MSI have used a variety of strategies to overcome this problem. 15,16,33,34 We therefore restricted all further analyses to regions that had been identified by a pathologist as tumor.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metabolites are found to be largely conserved in FFPE tissue samples, and thus, the data acquired with this protocol can be used in research and clinical practice, making full use to mining data in traditional FFPE tissue. Recent research applied MALDI-MS to FFPE tumor tissue sections and enabled cancer subtype classification, providing a promising complementary approach to current pathological technologies for precise digitized diagnosis of diseases (Möginger et al, 2020).…”
Section: Formalin-fixed and Paraffin-embedded Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in cancer research, spatial protein characterization of tissue and biomarker identification will lead to better diagnosis and individual predictive patterns of therapy response. Now, MALDI-MSI combined with machine learning has been used to classify various cancers including renal oncocytoma, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and results showed that MSI correctly classified 87% of patients (Möginger et al, 2020). In addition, the major advantages of the method classifying cancer subtypes also simultaneously reveal the molecular features of cancer cells.…”
Section: Pathological Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the analysis of tumor tissues with pronounced cellular and morphological heterogeneity benefits from the spatially resolved MSI technology [ 3 , 4 ]. Common applications for MSI in cancer studies include tumor typing and subtyping [ 5 7 ], studying resection margins and tumor heterogeneity [ 8 , 9 ], and finding biomarkers for tumor diagnosis, prognosis or prediction [ 10 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%