2008
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histologic Alterations from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Grade Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Clinicopathological Correlation

Abstract: After completing this course, the reader will be able to:1. Use the correlation of all data from clinical, imaging, and histopathologic observations by a multidisciplinary tumor board in the prognosis of patients with soft tissue sarcoma.2. Interpret the prognostic value of histologic response to chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma in contrast to its value in osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma.3. Evaluate the profound histologic alterations induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas.Access and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
51
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
51
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower cellularity in investigated fields from those cases, with large acellular spaces between abnormal giant cells (morphology described by other authors in human glioma treated with radiotherapy [44] and in human treated sarcoma [45]) could be partially responsible for that. We wondered if analyzing the number of Ki67 positive cells by mm 2 instead of percent tumor cells would be helpful for clarification, and the results may be seen in Figure S7, in which the number of Ki67 positive cells/mm 2 is illustrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The lower cellularity in investigated fields from those cases, with large acellular spaces between abnormal giant cells (morphology described by other authors in human glioma treated with radiotherapy [44] and in human treated sarcoma [45]) could be partially responsible for that. We wondered if analyzing the number of Ki67 positive cells by mm 2 instead of percent tumor cells would be helpful for clarification, and the results may be seen in Figure S7, in which the number of Ki67 positive cells/mm 2 is illustrated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…26,28,35 Such a distinction encompasses, in addition to tumor necrosis, the presence of fibrosis and acellular matrix as elements of nonviable tumor, and cumulatively represents treatment effect. In routine practice, a pathologist would presumably consider the entire area occupied by necrotic cells, acellular matrix, and loose fibrous tissue in estimating the extent of ''necrosis.''…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, there was a high level of concordance between the initial and final diagnoses (j ¼ .89; Supplemental Various histologic alterations associated with treatment effect were observed and were consistent with previously published descriptions (Figure 1). [27][28][29] An admixture of degenerating wispy osteoid matrix with empty lacunae, necrotic ghost cells, and edematous stroma with loose fibrous tissue was a commonly observed pattern of response. Other areas showed dense fibrosis or hyalinization, particularly prominent in fibroblastic osteosarcomas, whereas replacement of tumor by sheets of sclerotic acellular osteoid matrix was most common in osteoblastic osteosarcomas.…”
Section: Histologic Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be presumed that the endoprosthestic group typically has closer tumor margins and thus requires wider surgical margins, which is why they are obvious candidates for the endoprosthesis and not the CS procedure. For those patients with histologic tumor data, response to chemotherapy was categorized using a modified Huvos score [18]. The Huvos score is a classification system that grades the histologic response of tumors to preoperative chemotherapy based on the percentage of tumor necrosis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Huvos score is a classification system that grades the histologic response of tumors to preoperative chemotherapy based on the percentage of tumor necrosis. We used a modified version of the original grading system by Lucas et al [18] with ''poor'' = ''C 50% viability,'' ''moderate'' = ''C 5% but \ 50% viability,'' and ''excellent'' = ''0 B 5% viability''. This was further modified to responders (\ 50% tumor viability) and nonresponders (C 50% tumor viability).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%