1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00249392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histologic prognostic factors in ependymoma

Abstract: The prognostic value of a series of histologic signs and clinical features was studied in a series of 298 ependymomas, collected from different institutions. The distribution of tumor sites varied in relation to patient age, with infratentorial cases prevailing under 4 years. Life table univariate analysis demonstrated as highly significant prognostic factors: (1) the number of mitoses; (2) endothelial hyperplasia; (3) necrosis; (4) intracranial site; (5) age less than 4 years. Multivariate analysis by tumor s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
69
1
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
69
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Histological features of anaplasia, such as mitoses, microvascular proliferation and necrosis, serve as indicators of biological behaviour in other gliomas, including diffuse astrocytic tumours and oligodendrogliomas (Cohadon et al, 1985;Burger and Green, 1987;Ellison, 1998). However, the biological significance of these morphological features in ependymoma remains unclear; clinicopathological studies have provided conflicting evidence on the prognostic value of dividing ependymomas into classic (WHO grade 2) and anaplastic (grade 3) variants (Ross and Rubinstein, 1989;Sutton et al, 1990;Schiffer et al, 1991;Gerszten et al, 1996;Bouffet et al, 1998;Figarella-Branger et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histological features of anaplasia, such as mitoses, microvascular proliferation and necrosis, serve as indicators of biological behaviour in other gliomas, including diffuse astrocytic tumours and oligodendrogliomas (Cohadon et al, 1985;Burger and Green, 1987;Ellison, 1998). However, the biological significance of these morphological features in ependymoma remains unclear; clinicopathological studies have provided conflicting evidence on the prognostic value of dividing ependymomas into classic (WHO grade 2) and anaplastic (grade 3) variants (Ross and Rubinstein, 1989;Sutton et al, 1990;Schiffer et al, 1991;Gerszten et al, 1996;Bouffet et al, 1998;Figarella-Branger et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2007 WHO classification of CNS tumors places ependymoblastoma within the spectrum of PNETs with the capacity to differentiate along one or more cell lines and explicitly defines it as a tumor "with ependymoblastic rosettes." 9,23,28 Within this classification, ependymoblastoma has clear cytogenetic and histological characteristics that allow its differentiation from medulloblastomas and other PNETs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ependimomas são neoplasias de celularidade moderada, com morfologia nuclear monótona 1,2,4,6,8,11,12 . Os principais achados são as rosetas ependimárias, representadas por células colunares dispostas em torno de um canal central, e as pseudo-rosetas perivasculares, constituídas de células neoplásicas circunjacentes aos vasos 1,2,4,6,8,11,12 .…”
Section: Fig 5 Corte Histológico De Ependimoma Composto Por Células unclassified
“…Os principais achados são as rosetas ependimárias, representadas por células colunares dispostas em torno de um canal central, e as pseudo-rosetas perivasculares, constituídas de células neoplásicas circunjacentes aos vasos 1,2,4,6,8,11,12 . Degeneração mixóide, calcificação, necrose e focos de hemorragia podem ser observados 1,2,4,6,8,11,12 . Nas formas anaplásicas há aumento da celularidade, mitoses, proliferação vascular e por vezes focos de necrose 8 (Fig 5).…”
Section: Fig 5 Corte Histológico De Ependimoma Composto Por Células unclassified