2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histological and biomechanical evaluation of implanted graft materials in a rabbit vaginal and abdominal model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Size-wise, the lower limit of experimental vaginal surgery is the adult rabbit, whereas sheep may be a closer mimic to the clinical conditions of POP surgery. In rabbits, successful insertion of implants in the posterior vagina has been described, but grafted material is by definition small [27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. In contrast to abdominal repairs, rabbit vaginal repairs with mesh result in exposure rates as high as 50%, which is far above that reported clinically [30,31,34,35].…”
Section: Purpose and Design Of Animal Models And Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Size-wise, the lower limit of experimental vaginal surgery is the adult rabbit, whereas sheep may be a closer mimic to the clinical conditions of POP surgery. In rabbits, successful insertion of implants in the posterior vagina has been described, but grafted material is by definition small [27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. In contrast to abdominal repairs, rabbit vaginal repairs with mesh result in exposure rates as high as 50%, which is far above that reported clinically [30,31,34,35].…”
Section: Purpose and Design Of Animal Models And Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…One more limitation may be found in the choice of an abdominal animal model for the study of vaginal implants. In fact, in a rabbit model, histological and biomechanical differences between abdominal and vaginal implantations were noted [31]. On the other hand, no biomechanical differences were noted when a synthetic material was implanted on the abdomen and in the vagina of a sheep model [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Does this explain why some women respond more favorably after implantation of an allograft to augment a pelvic organ prolapse surgical repair? Animal studies suggest that prolapse repairs incorporating a synthetic allograft may yield higher vaginal stiffness index values than other types of graft material [15,16]. Further research is needed to determine if biomechanical properties of the vagina change after prolapse surgery with or without allograft augmentation and if symptom improvement correlates with the extent of change in in vivo vaginal biomechanical properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%