2013
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m113.490706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitor Kinetic Rate Constants Correlate with Cellular Histone Acetylation but Not Transcription and Cell Viability

Abstract: Background:The effect of HDAC inhibitor kinetic properties on biological function is currently unknown. Results:The kinetic rate constants of HDAC inhibitors differentially affect histone acetylation, cell viability, and gene expression. Conclusion: Evaluating HDAC inhibitor properties using histone acetylation is not predictive of their function on cellular activity. Significance: Characterizing the biological effect of different HDAC inhibitors will help to evaluate their clinical utility.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
364
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(401 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
36
364
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on reported structure-activity relationships (SARs), data regarding HDAC (Kalin and Bergman, 2013;Miller et al, 2003) and PDE5 inhibition (Manallack et al, 2005), and structural information that included the X-ray co-crystal structures for the HDAC2-vorinostat complex (PDB 4LXZ) (Lauffer et al, 2013) and PDE5-sildenafil complex (PDB 1TBF) (Zhang et al, 2004), we designed and synthesized compounds to interact with both HDAC (class I and HDAC6) and PDE5. Consequently, a novel series of pyrazolopyrimidinones were designed and synthesized that bore key chemical functionalities covering the critical pharmacophoric features (Figure 1a-e and Supplementary Figure S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on reported structure-activity relationships (SARs), data regarding HDAC (Kalin and Bergman, 2013;Miller et al, 2003) and PDE5 inhibition (Manallack et al, 2005), and structural information that included the X-ray co-crystal structures for the HDAC2-vorinostat complex (PDB 4LXZ) (Lauffer et al, 2013) and PDE5-sildenafil complex (PDB 1TBF) (Zhang et al, 2004), we designed and synthesized compounds to interact with both HDAC (class I and HDAC6) and PDE5. Consequently, a novel series of pyrazolopyrimidinones were designed and synthesized that bore key chemical functionalities covering the critical pharmacophoric features (Figure 1a-e and Supplementary Figure S1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such target compounds would have a profile of moderate HDAC class I inhibition, potent HDAC6 and PDE5 inhibition, optimal passage across the BBB, a short residence time, and a reduced half-life. In this way, the candidate drugs identified should have minimal toxicity as this is often associated with strong inhibition of HDAC class I isoforms (Robers et al, 2015) (eg, the FDA-approved potent pan-HDAC inhibitors, vorinostat and panobinostat) as well as with slow dissociation kinetics (Lauffer et al, 2013). The synergistic effect should lead to achieve a degree of histone 3 acetylation that is not possible with HDAC6-selective inhibitors (eg, Ricolinostat) and, on the other hand, these new molecules will also achieve a degree of tubulin acetylation that has been impossible to obtain with the FDA-approved class I inhibitor, valproic acid (Gurvich et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For MS-275 only, a 3-h incubation at room temperature was used with HDAC1, 2, and 3 due to slow association kinetics. 24 A control reaction without inhibitor was also included, which contained DMSO (1 µL) in HDAC-Glo buffer (24 µL). After incubation of the inhibitor with the affixed HDAC isoform, the ELISA-based HDAC activity assay protocol was followed as described above, with addition of HDAC-Glo reagent alone (25 µL).…”
Section: Inhibitor Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%