2015
DOI: 10.4103/2153-3539.151890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histopathology in 3D: From three-dimensional reconstruction to multi-stain and multi-modal analysis

Abstract: Light microscopy applied to the domain of histopathology has traditionally been a two-dimensional imaging modality. Several authors, including the authors of this work, have extended the use of digital microscopy to three dimensions by stacking digital images of serial sections using image-based registration. In this paper, we give an overview of our approach, and of extensions to the approach to register multi-modal data sets such as sets of interleaved histopathology sections with different stains, and sets … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some techniques took advantage from public databases, created by organizations like the Allen Brain Atlas (ABA; http://www.brain-map.org), to map a 3D image generated from data extracted with in situ hybridization (Hibbard and Hawkins, 1984; Ford-Holevinski et al, 1991; Hecksher-Sørensen and Sharpe, 2001) and immunofluorescent protocols (Parfitt et al, 2012; Magee et al, 2015) or after noninvasive optical sectioning with MRI or CT (Höhne and Hanson, 1992; Klein et al, 2010), to match the 3D images of gene expression patterns within the public database. These databases, however, are generally limited to a specific set of genes, animals of a specific age (ABA: embryonic stage, P56) and to a limited number of species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some techniques took advantage from public databases, created by organizations like the Allen Brain Atlas (ABA; http://www.brain-map.org), to map a 3D image generated from data extracted with in situ hybridization (Hibbard and Hawkins, 1984; Ford-Holevinski et al, 1991; Hecksher-Sørensen and Sharpe, 2001) and immunofluorescent protocols (Parfitt et al, 2012; Magee et al, 2015) or after noninvasive optical sectioning with MRI or CT (Höhne and Hanson, 1992; Klein et al, 2010), to match the 3D images of gene expression patterns within the public database. These databases, however, are generally limited to a specific set of genes, animals of a specific age (ABA: embryonic stage, P56) and to a limited number of species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3-dimensional histopathologic analysis may also help quantify LN metastasis more accurately. 35 There were limitations in this study, including a small sample size. The mean intensities were calculated from the 2-dimensional videos generated after postprocessing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As a subject for a future study, it is possible that the retention of targeted microbubbles may be more accurately obtained by a 3‐dimensional evaluation, especially in heterogeneous LNs. A 3‐dimensional histopathologic analysis may also help quantify LN metastasis more accurately . There were limitations in this study, including a small sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mostly using every 10th serial section (~50 μm between sections) was sufficient to generate a 3D image . For observation of larger objects, 100 μm gap was acceptable (around 100 sections over 1 cm thickness), and thus, the workload could be dramatically reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%