Dear sirs,We read with great interest the recent publication entitled ''Laparoscopic fundoplication: Nissen versus Toupet twoyear outcome of a prospective randomized study of 200 patients regarding preoperative esophageal motility'' [1].We already published in 2005 an analysis of our patients operated within the so-called tailored approach on 209 patients with a median follow-up of 52 months [2]. We compared those patients without recurrence regarding their long-term symptoms and their functional results and came to the same conclusion as the authors of the above mentioned publication.The laparoscopic partial posterior (Toupet) fundoplication seems to be the better operative procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).It has a lower rate of side effects, nota bene less dysphagia and, given the appropriate technique, it restores the antireflux barrier to the same extent as the Nissen fundoplication [2]. Moreover, in our studies [2, 3] we were even able to demonstrate an improvement of former impaired esophageal motility in the Toupet group, while this was not found in the Nissen group. In our study, there was a strong correlation between postoperative dysphagia and impaired postoperative lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation (Spearman correlation; r s = -0.75 at a p value \0.05) and the same was true for bloating (r s = -0.71), inability to belch (r s = -0.82), inability to vomit (r s = -0.86), and epigastric pain (r s = -0.68). In other words, the Nissen fundoplication may lead to an impairment of the LES relaxation often to an extent like in achalasia, while this was not seen after a Toupet fundoplication; so we concluded that an impaired relaxation could be the main cause of this problem.