Histopathology of Ripe Rot Caused by<i>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</i>on Muscadine Grape

Daykin, M. E.

doi:10.1094/phyto-74-1339

Cited by 21 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, the available information tends to suggest that the resistance varies widely within species rather than between species. For example, a survey of M. rotundifolia cultivars showed that the incidence of ripe rot on the bronze-fruited cultivars ('Carlos', 'Fry', 'Magnolia', 'Scuppernong') ranged from 6.7 to 33.5%, while symptoms of ripe rot were never observed on the black-fruited cultivars ('Noble', 'Tarheel', 'Pride') (Daykin and Milholland 1984). Similarly, a survey of table grape cultivars from South Korea showed that four were resistant to ripe rot; two were derived from V. vinifera; and two were interspecific hybrids with North American species (Jang et al 2011).…”

Section: Resistance To Non-botrytis Bunch Rotsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scion Breeding for Resistance to Biotic Stresses

Dry

Riaz

Fuchs

et al. 2019

Compendium of Plant Genomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The majority of grapevine cultivars used for wine, table grape and dried-fruit production are derived from the Eurasian grape species Vitis vinifera because of its superior aroma and flavour characteristics. However, this species has little or no genetic resistance against the major pests and pathogens that attack above-ground parts of the grapevine including the trunk, canopy and bunches. As a result, grape production is highly dependent on the frequent use of fungicides and pesti-cides, which has significant implications for the economic and environmental sustainability of grape production. This chapter will summarize our current knowledge of the different resistance loci/genes that have been identified in wild grapevine species that could potentially be used to develop new grapevine cultivars with enhanced genetic resistance by marker-assisted selection.

show abstract

Section: Resistance To Non-botrytis Bunch Rotsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scion Breeding for Resistance to Biotic Stresses

Dry

Riaz

Fuchs

et al. 2019

Compendium of Plant Genomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, infectious diseases with significant risks to grape production have drawn broad attention from the grapevine industry. Grapevines are affected by several foliar diseases (Gadoury et al, 2012; Zhang et al, 2017), fruit diseases (Daykin and Milholland, 1984; Hong et al, 2008; Greer et al, 2011; Jayawardena et al, 2015), and trunk diseases (Yan et al, 2013; Dissanayake et al, 2015a,b). Grapevine trunk diseases have drawn considerable attention, as these diseases affect the perennial parts of the vine and can limit grape production for many years (Yan et al, 2013, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

High Genetic Diversity and Species Complexity of Diaporthe Associated With Grapevine Dieback in China

Manawasinghe

Dissanayake

Li³

et al. 2019

Front. Microbiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Grapevine trunk diseases have become one of the main threats to grape production worldwide, with Diaporthe species as an emerging group of pathogens in China. At present, relatively little is known about the taxonomy and genetic diversity of Chinese Diaporthe populations, including their relationships to other populations worldwide. Here, we conducted an extensive field survey in six provinces in China to identify and characterize Diaporthe species in grape vineyards. Ninety-four isolates were identified and analyzed using multi-locus phylogeny. The isolates belonged to eight species, including three novel taxa, Diaporthe guangxiensis (D. guangxiensis), Diaporthe hubeiensis (D. hubeiensis), Diaporthe viniferae (D. viniferae) , and three new host records, Diaporthe gulyae (D. gulyae), Diaporthe pescicola (D. pescicola) , and Diaporthe unshiuensis (D. unshiuensis) . The most commonly isolated species was Diaporthe eres (D. eres) . In addition, high genetic diversity was observed for D. eres in Chinese vineyards. Haplotype network analysis of D. eres isolates from China and Europe showed a close relationship between samples from the two geographical locations and evidence for recombination. In comparative pathogenicity testing, D. gulyae was the most aggressive taxon, whereas D. hubeiensis was the least aggressive. This study provides new insights into the Diaporthe species associated with grapevines in China, and our results can be used to develop effective disease management strategies.

show abstract

“…Ripe rot, a serious disease in grapevine, has been reported in many species of Vitis L. 4 and Muscadinia (Planch.) Small 7 . Li et al 8 evaluated ripe rot resistance in 56 accessions of Chinese wild Vitis species and found all of them to be resistant to ripe rot disease.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cgr1, a ripe rot resistance QTL in Vitis amurensis ‘Shuang Hong’ grapevine

Tian

Lai

et al. 2019

Hortic Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ripe rot is a serious grapevine disease in Vitis L. and Muscadinia (Planch.) Small. However, resistance to this disease has been reported in some oriental Vitis species. To identify resistance-related Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) from the Chinese grape species V. amurensis , an F 1 population of V. vinifera ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ × V. amurensis ‘Shuang Hong’ was used to map the ripe rot resistance loci expected in ‘Shuang Hong’ grape. A total of 7598 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between the parents were identified in our previous study, and 934 SNPs were selected for genetic map construction. These SNPs are distributed across the 19 chromosomes covering a total of 1665.31 cM in length, with an average of 1.81 cM between markers. Ripe rot resistance phenotypes among the hybrids were evaluated in vitro using excised leaves for three consecutive years from 2016 to 2018; a continuous variation was found among the F 1 hybrids, and the Pearson correlation coefficients of the phenotypes scored in all three years were significant at the 0.01 level. Notably, the first QTL reported for resistance to grape ripe rot disease, named Cgr1 , was identified on chromosome 14 of ‘Shuang Hong’ grapevine. Cgr1 could explain up to 19.90% of the phenotypic variance. In addition, a SNP named ‘np19345’ was identified as a molecular marker closely linked to the peak of Cgr1 and has the potential to be developed as a marker for the Cgr1 resistance haplotype.

show abstract

Histopathology of Ripe Rot Caused byColletotrichum gloeosporioideson Muscadine Grape

Cited by 21 publications

References 0 publications

Scion Breeding for Resistance to Biotic Stresses

Scion Breeding for Resistance to Biotic Stresses

High Genetic Diversity and Species Complexity of Diaporthe Associated With Grapevine Dieback in China

Cgr1, a ripe rot resistance QTL in Vitis amurensis ‘Shuang Hong’ grapevine

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About