2004
DOI: 10.1201/9781420038170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histopathology of Seed-Borne Infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
35
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is less likely to be the case in chickpeas as Arabidopsis belongs to a different Family (Brassicaceae, as compared to Fabaceae) which have distinctly different flower and seed characteristics. In particular, the seed coat of Arabidopsis conveys dormancy (Debeaujon, Léon-Kloosterziel & Koornneef, 2000) and its pigmentation is located in the innermost seed coat layers (Bouman, 1975) whereas chickpea seeds have no dormancy and the pigmentation is derived from the outermost seed coat layers (Singh & Mathur, 2004). In addition, while both genes confer a more rounded eccentricity, the ats mutant of Arabidopsis was found to be single recessive (Léon-Kloosterziel et al, 1994) whereas the Rd allele of chickpea was single dominant (Knights et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is less likely to be the case in chickpeas as Arabidopsis belongs to a different Family (Brassicaceae, as compared to Fabaceae) which have distinctly different flower and seed characteristics. In particular, the seed coat of Arabidopsis conveys dormancy (Debeaujon, Léon-Kloosterziel & Koornneef, 2000) and its pigmentation is located in the innermost seed coat layers (Bouman, 1975) whereas chickpea seeds have no dormancy and the pigmentation is derived from the outermost seed coat layers (Singh & Mathur, 2004). In addition, while both genes confer a more rounded eccentricity, the ats mutant of Arabidopsis was found to be single recessive (Léon-Kloosterziel et al, 1994) whereas the Rd allele of chickpea was single dominant (Knights et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al respecto, Agarwal & Sinclair (1997), Neergaard (1979) y Singh & Mathur (2004) afirman que el proceso de transmisión de patógenos es influenciado por diversos factores, entre los cuales se mencionan la especie cultivada (resistencia varietal), condiciones ambientales (temperatura, luz, lluvia, humedad ambiental), tipo, humedad y microflora de suelo, pH, población de plantas, profundidad de siembra, fertilización, supervivencia del inóculo, vigor de la semilla, y localización del inóculo. La ubicación del patógeno en la semilla es considerado como uno de los más importantes en los estudios de transmisión (Singh & Mathur, 2004).…”
unclassified
“…michiganensis has been previously observed (2,30). However, no detailed histopathological study had been performed on the routes of seed infection (18). To see the impact of different stages of fruit development on fruit and seed infection by C. michiganensis subsp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…michiganensis, is a systemic pathogen it is hypothesized that it accesses the developing seeds via the host vascular system (1). One of the earliest studies on bacterial canker looked at the systemic movement of the pathogen to the seeds; however, no detailed histopathological studies have clearly demonstrated this natural route of seed infection (2,18), and the significance of bird's-eye lesions in fruit colonization remains unstudied. Our working hypothesis was that seed contamination by C. michiganensis subsp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation