Historically rice-farming societies have tighter social norms in China and worldwide

Abstract

Data recently published in PNAS mapped out regional differences in the tightness of social norms across China [R. Y. J. Chua, K. G. Huang, M. Jin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 6720–6725 (2019)]. Norms were tighter in developed, urbanized areas and weaker in rural areas. We tested whether historical paddy rice farming has left a legacy on social norms in modern China. Premodern rice farming could plausibly create strong social norms because paddy rice relied on irrigation networks. Rice farmers coordinated their water use and kept track of each person’s labor contributions. Rice villages also established strong norms of reciprocity to cope with labor demands that were twice as high as dryland crops like wheat. In line with this theory, China’s historically rice-farming areas had tighter social norms than wheat-farming areas, even beyond differences in development and urbanization. Rice–wheat differences were just as large among people in 10 neighboring provinces (n = 3,835) along the rice–wheat border. These neighboring provinces differ sharply in rice and wheat, but little in latitude, temperature, and other potential confounding variables. Outside of China, rice farming predicted norm tightness in 32 countries around the world. Finally, people in rice-farming areas scored lower on innovative thinking, which tends to be lower in societies with tight norms. This natural test case within China might explain why East Asia—historically reliant on rice farming—has tighter social norms than the wheat-farming West.

The Lineage Theory of the Regional Variation of Individualism/Collectivism in China

“…The other four dimensions are power distance, masculinity/femininity, uncertainty avoidance, and long-term vs. short-term orientation. Similarly, in addition to the I/C dimension, the three-dimensional perspective Triandis et al (1988) includes tightness/looseness and cultural complexity ( Chua et al, 2019 ; Talhelm and English, 2020 ). The effects of lineage development should be explored from all these dimensions.…”

From washing hands to washing consciences and polishing reputations

“…Farming and fishing communities, which emphasize harmonious social coordination, showed more holistic cognitive styles than did herding communities, which emphasize individual decision-making and social independence, even though all three communities were in the same national, geographic, ethnic, and linguistic region of Turkey's eastern Black Sea (Uskul, Kitayama, & Nisbett, 2008). Within the category of farming, ricegrowing requires more social coordination (e.g., irrigation networks) than wheat-growing; accordingly, rice farmers showed more interdependence and holistic cognitive styles (Talhelm et al, 2014) and tighter social norms (Talhelm & English, 2020) than did wheat farmers, even within the same country and controlling for factors such as modernization, population density, and pathogen prevalence. Pathogens and diseases do matter though, as in Kwon et al's example of path 4-5 (see also sect.…”

On “Nationology”: The Gravitational Field of National Culture

“…Large countries like China and India, for example, are divided into regions with rice agriculture in the south and wheat agriculture in the north. These are climatic distinctions based on their geographical latitudes which scholars argue are associated with substantial cultural differences into the present (Talhelm et al, 2014;Talhelm & English, 2020).…”