Histories of climate, science, and colonization in Australia and New Zealand, 1800–1945

Abstract

This review article focuses on scholarship that lies at the intersection of histories of climate and British settler colonization in Australia and New Zealand. It first discusses the role of climate in their colonial histories and then developments in the field of climate history, examining similarities and differences within and between Australia and New Zealand. Next, it outlines two significant recent themes in climate history in both places: contested climate debates and perceptions, and social impacts and responses to climate. The article finishes by recommending future areas for research. Throughout, we stress the importance of local‐level approaches to climate as a means of understanding past and present, popular and scientific, interpretations of climate. We also emphasize the role that imperatives of colonization have played in shaping particular kinds of climate knowledge, including in overwriting nonelite views of climate. WIREs Clim Change 2016, 7:893–909. doi: 10.1002/wcc.426 This article is categorized under: Climate, History, Society, Culture > World Historical Perspectives

Computation of modern anthropogenic-deposit thicknesses in urban areas: A case study in Rome, Italy

“…In Manhattan, New York City (NY), thick anthrostrata are widespread and mainly related to 19th-century filling materials (Schuldenrein and Aiuvalasit, 2011). In Australia, large urban centres were not established before the 19th century (O’Gorman et al, 2016). However, in Sydney (NSW) several human activities, such as mining, filling, reclamation of land, and waste disposal, have been performed (Chesnut, 1980) so intensively that the related deposits were mapped on the 1:100,000 official geological map (Wilson et al, 1983).…”

Australia's national climate: learning to adapt?

“…As elsewhere, the dominant scientific voices of climate-climate science and meteorology-were entangled in these nation-building efforts, and enrolled in mapping, securing, and cultivating the nation's territory. 1 In Australia, as in the USA, investments in atmospheric sciences were shaped by, and shaped, the strategic prerogatives of an emerging nation, with its drive to secure territory through pastoral and agricultural settlement helping consolidate forms of techno-nationalism (O'Gorman, Beattie & Henry, 2016). Other forms of techno-nationalism included government meteorological surveys, as well as engineering and irrigation projects that were explicitly designed to immunise land managers, rural communities, and the national population at large against a variable climate.…”

Climate and colonialism

“…In the Australian colonies, meteorology was among the first sciences to be institutionalized, its practitioners serving “as important environmental interpreters for colonists and governments” (O'Gorman, , p. 180). Antipodean meteorology is well recorded by historians, with institutional histories increasingly giving way to more nuanced accounts of the complex motivations behind meteorological knowledge production (O'Gorman, Beattie, & Henry, ). By the 1860s, all the Australian colonial governments had some form of institutionalized meteorology, and the rise of telegraphy meant that regional climates “took on abstract forms through isobar maps and statistical evaluations.” In so doing, meteorologists “answered the calls of colonialism and modern science to know and categorize, and in so doing, control environments” (O'Gorman, , p. 181).…”