2012
DOI: 10.1017/s0020859011000770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historiography and Research Problems of Slavery and the Slave Trade in a Global-Historical Perspective

Abstract: SummaryThis article takes a global-historical perspective on all slaveries and slave trades (and contraband trading of human bodies) in relation to today's state of capitalist accumulation. It follows the different “national” schools of slavery research in different imperial traditions, as well as the sections of historical thinking stimulated through slavery research. Although legal ownership over humans does not exist any more, more women and men are in con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the great efforts from a wide range of heritage organisations, scholars and academics, we still face epistemic colonialism based on (1) geo-political influences, (2) European and Western phenomenology and existentialism (geo-historical), and (3) the convergence of technology and knowledge systems in which current Western, and particularly Anglo-centres of research and education, have produced a 'universal' set of knowledge that is widely accepted (geo-cultural) (Mignolo 2002). According to Zeuske (2012) up to 80% of the world's research on the history of slavery comes from the USA, 10% from Brazil, followed by Great Britain (commonly linked to the USA), Germany, France, Portugal, Spain, Italy, and the Baltic States. British involvement in the Trans-Atlantic slave trade and the ongoing impact is a particularly under researched area, especially when compared to the USA.…”
Section: Breaking Colonialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the great efforts from a wide range of heritage organisations, scholars and academics, we still face epistemic colonialism based on (1) geo-political influences, (2) European and Western phenomenology and existentialism (geo-historical), and (3) the convergence of technology and knowledge systems in which current Western, and particularly Anglo-centres of research and education, have produced a 'universal' set of knowledge that is widely accepted (geo-cultural) (Mignolo 2002). According to Zeuske (2012) up to 80% of the world's research on the history of slavery comes from the USA, 10% from Brazil, followed by Great Britain (commonly linked to the USA), Germany, France, Portugal, Spain, Italy, and the Baltic States. British involvement in the Trans-Atlantic slave trade and the ongoing impact is a particularly under researched area, especially when compared to the USA.…”
Section: Breaking Colonialismmentioning
confidence: 99%