2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2012.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History of ocular straylight measurement: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
129
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
1
129
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This involves finding out what (equivalent) background luminance is required for a test object to reach the same threshold value as it does in the presence of the glare source. Although this involves rather elaborate testing, many studies, including a few relatively large population studies, used it up until the 1984 review by Vos, 1984. In later years, the groups of Sjöstrand and Elliott, among others, have continued this line with a simplified approach (Abrahamsson & Sjöstrand, 1986;Elliott, Gilchrist, & Whitaker, 1989;Paulsson & Sjöstrand, 1980;van den Berg et al, 2013 The CC method makes use of other psychophysical paradigms, which make the measurement more effective and precise. First, the 2-alternative forced choice (2AFC) technique was used with a bi-partite field (Figure 3), to compare the intensity of straylight to that of a comparison light.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This involves finding out what (equivalent) background luminance is required for a test object to reach the same threshold value as it does in the presence of the glare source. Although this involves rather elaborate testing, many studies, including a few relatively large population studies, used it up until the 1984 review by Vos, 1984. In later years, the groups of Sjöstrand and Elliott, among others, have continued this line with a simplified approach (Abrahamsson & Sjöstrand, 1986;Elliott, Gilchrist, & Whitaker, 1989;Paulsson & Sjöstrand, 1980;van den Berg et al, 2013 The CC method makes use of other psychophysical paradigms, which make the measurement more effective and precise. First, the 2-alternative forced choice (2AFC) technique was used with a bi-partite field (Figure 3), to compare the intensity of straylight to that of a comparison light.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Around 1990, the "direct compensation" method was designed (van den Berg, Franssen, Kruijt, & Coppens, 2013) and accepted as the gold standard (Elliott & Bullimore, 1993;Elliott et al, 1990). Most of the present review is based on the further development of the "compensation comparison" (CC) method (van den Berg et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A clinical test that could accurately predict the effects of glare and light-scattering sources on driving performance should be a valuable diagnostic tool for evaluating new medical products that physically produces the light scatter or affects how one realizes the intraocular light scatter. Several disability glare tests have been developed for clinical use (24)(25) .…”
Section: Disability Glarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, refractive and cataract surgeries aim higher quality standards for their results. (24) . The patient is presented with two alternative forced choices and asked to choose between the stronger of two flickers presented in controlled background lights.…”
Section: Final Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The citation counts are different, as the Scopus database contains more journals than Web of Science, and therefore the position numbers are slightly variant. There are three references [6][7][8] in the table about topics not related to ionizing radiation, illustrating the successful effort of the editors to publish in all areas of Medical Physics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%