History of research performance measurement systems in the Australian higher education sector

Abstract

Performance measurement systems (PMSs) are a global phenomenon emanating from new public management (NPM) reforms. While they are now prolific and entrenched, they have attracted criticism based on their design and the manner in which they are applied. The purpose of this article is to explore the history of accounting for research in the Australian higher education sector (HES). It focuses on how successive Australian governments have steered research within the sector through the introduction of PMSs, in line with NPM reforms. Relying on publicly available online policy documents and scholarly literature, the study traces the development of performance measures within the Australian HES from the mid-1980s to 2015. It contributes to literature in management accounting aspects of NPM through the means of management accounting techniques such as PMSs. It also contributes to accounting history literature through an examination of three decades of accounting for research in the Australian HES.

Does emotional intelligence matter to academic work performance? Evidence from business faculties in Australia

“…Bell et al (2012, p. 25) contend that ‘increasing levels of stress in university staff may be causing universities as institutions to not function as well as they might have in the past’. Martin‐Sardesai et al (2019) report some evidence of this, arguing that changes in the academic work environment, including to funding and performance measurement systems, have led to dysfunctional organisational outcomes of discouraging innovative research and gaming.…”

Impact of research assessment exercises on research approaches and foci of accounting disciplines in Australia

“…The large-scale changes in the higher education sector (HES) over the last few decades since RAEs were first introduced; and how these reforms have impacted on academic lives have been welldocumented -see, for example, Lewis (2014) and . Most notably, attention has been drawn to a new era of managerialism, often termed 'new public management', where heightened accountability is moved onto universities under the guise that private sector approaches are necessary for the public sector (Martin-Sardesai, Guthrie, Tooley and Chaplin, 2017). These new management systems encompassed performance measurement systems and indicators .…”

Expectations in the workplace: a qualitative study among Australian and South African academic pharmacists

“…Often referred to as management by objectives, performance management is a key component of managerialism . Managerialism was originally implemented in Australia in the 1980s under the guise of New Performance Management with the aim of improving effectiveness and efficiency in the public sector, including tertiary (higher) education . Managerialism increased steadily in Australian universities, and by early 2015, New Public Management (and performance management) had taken root .…”

“…[13][14][15] Managerialism was originally implemented in Australia in the 1980s under the guise of New Performance Management with the aim of improving effectiveness and efficiency in the public sector, including tertiary (higher) education. [10,13,14,16] Managerialism increased steadily in Australian universities, and by early 2015, New Public Management (and performance management) had taken root. [17] In the data-driven environment of higher education, performance management gave rise to teaching and research metrics, and workload models.…”

“…Excellence in Research Australia measures research outputs and provides increased accountability by universities for research funds provided to them by the government. However, ERA also gave rise to a proliferation of metrics which increased competitiveness and benchmarking, and contributed to the prominence of performance management.…”