2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hit Dexter 2.0: Machine-Learning Models for the Prediction of Frequent Hitters

Abstract: Assay interference caused by small molecules continues to pose a significant challenge for early drug discovery. A number of rule-based and similarity-based approaches have been derived that allow the flagging of potentially "badly behaving compounds", "bad actors" or "nuisance compounds". These compounds are typically aggregators, reactive compounds and/or pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS), and many of them are frequent hitters. Hit Dexter is a recently introduced machine learning approach that predict… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The PubChem ( ) and HIT ( ) databases were utilized to identify the verified targets of each active component ( Song et al., 2018 ). In order to identify the potential targets of V. baillonii , the molecular similarity match tool was used based on the simplified molecular input line entry specification (SMILES) in the similarity ensemble approach (SEA) ( P <0.05) ( ) and SwissTargetPrediction ( P <0.05) ( ) ( Stork et al., 2019 ). The UniProt ( ) database was used to standardize the results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PubChem ( ) and HIT ( ) databases were utilized to identify the verified targets of each active component ( Song et al., 2018 ). In order to identify the potential targets of V. baillonii , the molecular similarity match tool was used based on the simplified molecular input line entry specification (SMILES) in the similarity ensemble approach (SEA) ( P <0.05) ( ) and SwissTargetPrediction ( P <0.05) ( ) ( Stork et al., 2019 ). The UniProt ( ) database was used to standardize the results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…bkslab.org/) and SwissTargetPrediction (P<0.05) (http://www. swisstargetprediction.ch/) (Stork et al, 2019). The UniProt (https://www.uniprot.org/) database was used to standardize the results.…”
Section: Compound Profiling and Disease Target Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, these filters should be applied with care (Baell and Nissink, 2018). Stork et al (2018, 2019) developed the Hit Dexter model to predict frequent-hitter, aggregator, PAINS, dark chemical matter (Wassermann et al, 2015b), and other potential nuisance compounds. The Hit Dexter model is based on a set of extensively tested compounds from PubChem represented by their 2D molecular fingerprints.…”
Section: Predicting Compound Activity Using Large Chemogenomics Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most published computational promiscuity analysis methods rely on statistical analysiso fh istorical activity data extracted from primary screens [17,20,25] and, lessfrequently,f rom confirmatory concentration-response screens. [18,26] An unusually high hit rate for ac ompound across many screens for an HTS technology can be an indication that the compound is causingi nterference. Similarly,i facompound is active against aw ide range of targets or target families, it mustb et reated carefully as it is likely unselective or perhaps prone to false readouts.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While chemical scaffolds can be inherently promiscuous, [13,14] any specific pharmacophore or substructure can have ah igh impact on ac ompound's promiscuity. [15,16] The Hit Dexter platform [17,18] predicts various types of frequent-hitters, which are compounds that are active in many assays,b ased on as et of highly tested PubChem compounds represented as molecular fingerprints. Hit Dexter 2.0 covers both primary andc onfirmatory dose-response assays and classifies compoundsa sp romiscuous or not with an MCC of 0.64 and aR OC AUC of 0.96.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%