1994
DOI: 10.1038/ng0294-157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HLA DR–DQ associations with cervical carcinoma show papillomavirus–type specificity

Abstract: Cervical carcinoma is now known to be associated with human papillomaviruses (HPV), but the evidence for a link with specific HLA loci is controversial. The role of genetic variation at the HLA class II loci and among HPV types in cervical carcinoma was investigated by PCR DNA amplification and oligonucleotide probe typing of paraffin-embedded invasive cervical cancer tissue from Hispanic patients and of cervical swabs from Hispanic controls. Certain HLA class II haplotypes (such as DRB1*1501-DQB1*0602) were a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

13
165
10
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
13
165
10
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The heterogeneity in results for this haplotype across studies and in different ethnic populations suggests that DRB1*1501-DQB1*0602 is not a host cofactor, which directly modifies the risk of HG-CIN. The role of DRB1*1501-DQB1*0602 is more likely race-specific, resulting from linkage disequilibrium with other causal alleles in certain populations such as American Hispanics 14,38 and Swedes. 12,15 The Class I HLA-B7 allele was not associated in the BCCR study either with a weak risk of HG-CIN (for the allele alone), or with a higher risk of disease when coinherited together with DQB1*0302 as has been reported recently in 2 other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The heterogeneity in results for this haplotype across studies and in different ethnic populations suggests that DRB1*1501-DQB1*0602 is not a host cofactor, which directly modifies the risk of HG-CIN. The role of DRB1*1501-DQB1*0602 is more likely race-specific, resulting from linkage disequilibrium with other causal alleles in certain populations such as American Hispanics 14,38 and Swedes. 12,15 The Class I HLA-B7 allele was not associated in the BCCR study either with a weak risk of HG-CIN (for the allele alone), or with a higher risk of disease when coinherited together with DQB1*0302 as has been reported recently in 2 other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 More consistent findings have been reported in favor of a protective effect (odds ratios (ORs) of approximately 0.3-0.4) for HLA alleles DRB1*13 and DQB1*0603, which are in linkage disequilibrium. [10][11][12][13][14][15]19,20 Two larger studies in distinct populations in the US and Costa Rica showed elevated risks of low-and high-grade cervical lesions and cancer in women who were carriers of both class I allele HLA-B7 and DQB1*0302. 19,21 The Biomarkers of Cervical Cancer Risk (BCCR) case-control study was designed to investigate the role of the several candidate alleles from Class I and Class II genes on the risk of preinvasive high grade cervical neoplasia in a Canadian population, after adjusting for the potential mediating or confounding effects of ethnicity and other known risk factors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Thirteen high-risk HPV genotypes included in the probe B cocktail were found to be of HPV genotypes 16,18,31,33,35,39,45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68.…”
Section: Study Procedures and Collection Of Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] The DQB1*0602-DRB1*1501 and DQA1*0102-DQB1*0602 haplotypes have been found to be associated with increasing risk of cervical cancer in the HPV16 infected women. [16][17][18] Protective effects of certain HLA class II alleles have also been reported. A metaanalysis showed the evidence of protective effect of DQB1*0603 and DRB1*13 alleles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] Certain HLA class II alleles, such as DRB1*1501 and DQB1*0602, have been shown to increase the risk for cervical carcinoma, most strongly in HPV 16-positive carcinomas. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] We have previously shown that the increased carcinoma risk primarily depends on that the alleles render carriers more susceptible to HPV16 infections. 12 In addition, carriers of these HLA susceptibility alleles had higher HPV 16 load in their cervical smears compared to HPV 16-positive noncarriers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%