2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2020.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HLA-E typing of more than 2.5 million potential hematopoietic stem cell donors: Methods and population-specific allele frequencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found the combined frequency in this cohort of HLA‐E * 01:01 and HLA‐E * 01:03 alleles was 97.5%, which is in line with the previously published data 7,8,16 . It should be noted however, that as this cohort is not a random population sample we acknowledge that allele frequencies presented from this cohort do not necessarily represent the true frequencies in populations.…”
Section: Assigned Allele Name Closest Allele Genomic Dna Mismatch Gen...supporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We found the combined frequency in this cohort of HLA‐E * 01:01 and HLA‐E * 01:03 alleles was 97.5%, which is in line with the previously published data 7,8,16 . It should be noted however, that as this cohort is not a random population sample we acknowledge that allele frequencies presented from this cohort do not necessarily represent the true frequencies in populations.…”
Section: Assigned Allele Name Closest Allele Genomic Dna Mismatch Gen...supporting
confidence: 91%
“…11 We found the combined frequency in this cohort of HLA-E*01:01 and HLA-E*01:03 alleles was 97.5%, which is in line with the previously published data. 7,8,16 It should be noted however, that as this cohort is not a random population sample we acknowledge that allele frequencies presented from this cohort do not necessarily represent the true frequencies in populations. Across all samples in this cohort, we observed 19 unique protein variants and aside from HLA-E*01:01 and HLA-E*01:03, the next most frequently observed allele was HLA-E*01:06 at 2.0% (Figure 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…47 Indeed, a recent paper using data from the 100K genomes project and confirmatory sequencing identified intronic polymorphism in HLA-DRA and a plethora of DRB1 associations. 48 While only two different DRA proteins were known to exist, identification of intronic polymorphisms shows that the gene is more diverse than previously thought, continuing a trend in the field recently observed for HLA-E. 49,50 Recently, DP haplotypes (spanning DPA1, DPB1 and their intergenic region) were shown to contain previously unknown polymorphism around the promotor, with potentially functional consequences. 51 We observed in some additional cell lines (not included in this study) that despite successful amplification of most loci, we were unable to obtain PCR products for some.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For HLA-E, the typing method has long been limited to resolve the dimorphic amino acid at position 107 (R or G) by either PCR-SSP (PCR with Sequence-Specific Primers (194)(195)(196)(197), PCR-SSO (PCR-Sequence Specific Oligo Probes (198), PCR-RFLP (PCR Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism) alone (199) or in combination with ARMS (Amplification Refractory Mutation System) (200), PCR-SSCP (PCR-single strand conformation polymorphism) (201), Taqman assay (202) or sequence based typing of a limited part of the HLA-E gene either by Sanger sequencing (203)(204)(205)(206)(207) or recently also by NGS with Illumina (208). In this latter study HLA-E was typed for over 2.5 million potential stem cell donors worldwide and although only a limited 535 bp amplicon (including last part of exon 2, intron 2 and first part of exon 3) was sequenced, it has caused an explosion of new HLA-E alleles (209).…”
Section: Non-classical Hla Class I Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%