2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2007.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HMM-based on-line signature verification: Feature extraction and signature modeling

Abstract: Esta es la versión de autor del artículo publicado en: This is an author produced version of a paper published in:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
122
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
122
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A time functions-based system based on previous works [5], [19] is considered. Only time functions related to X, Y coordinates and pressure are considered in this work.…”
Section: B Feature Extraction and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A time functions-based system based on previous works [5], [19] is considered. Only time functions related to X, Y coordinates and pressure are considered in this work.…”
Section: B Feature Extraction and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X and Y pen coordinates, pressure, etc.) for verification [5]. Traditionally, time functions-based systems have achieved better recognition performance than featurebased systems [6], [7], [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are very few research works in the field of dynamic signature for forensic examinations [1,16,8]. The majority of relevant literature regarding dynamic signature analysis is in the field of biometric recognition [4], which make use of algorithms such as Hidden Markov Models [5,18] or Dynamic Time Warping [13,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For online signature verification, many classifiers have been attempted by different researchers such as distance based classifier [5], HMM [6,7], SVM [8], PNN [9], Bayesian [10], Symbolic classifier [11], Random Forest [8]. The performance of a verification system is measured in terms of two error rates namely false acceptance rate (FAR) and false rejection rate (FAR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%