2015
DOI: 10.6029/smartcr.2015.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HMM-based Scheme for Smart Instructor Activity Recognition in a Lecture Room Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peerevaluation is also useful but time-consuming and may be biased. Therefore, automation using video analysis is useful for teachers and instructors [31,32]. In this case study, input lecture video streams are captured in an uncontrolled realistic environment and the instructor action recognition methodology begins with foreground extraction and the computing of MHIs for each video.…”
Section: Case Study: Instructor Action Recognition In Lecture Room Scenario Using Dtmdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peerevaluation is also useful but time-consuming and may be biased. Therefore, automation using video analysis is useful for teachers and instructors [31,32]. In this case study, input lecture video streams are captured in an uncontrolled realistic environment and the instructor action recognition methodology begins with foreground extraction and the computing of MHIs for each video.…”
Section: Case Study: Instructor Action Recognition In Lecture Room Scenario Using Dtmdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teaching effectiveness is a fundamental concept in contemporary education, valued by academic institutions as a goal on their own right. Some researchers have explored human pose recognition techniques using handcrafted features for estimating the instructor's activities in the classroom [1][2][3][4] walking, writing, pointing towards the board, standing, and addressing and pointing towards presentations, respectively. Silhouette representation is often computationally less expensive but demands precise segmentation of human silhouettes for pose estimation and such techniques have primarily focused on handcrafted representations of spatial information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Dollar et al [5] propose the mapping of 2D to 3D spatiotemporal interest points as cuboid descriptions for actions prediction, while Wang and Schmid [7] establish dense motion trajectories 2 Mathematical Problems in Engineering (iDT) by computing the camera movement information. There are various types of spatiotemporal features to generalize action recognition including, spatiotemporal features [1], 3D-SIFT [8], HOG3D [9], extended SURF [10], iDT [7], histogram of optical flow (HOF) [11], and motion boundary histogram (MBH) [12]. Describing the iDT with MBH, HOG, HOF have shown the better prediction of activities on benchmark datasets (UCF101 [13], HMDB [14] and THUMOS [15]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some computer vision findings have been reported to automatically estimate instructor performance using pose, gesture and activity recognition [15,19,20]. In [15], visionbased instructor activity recognition uses silhouette representation to train a Hidden Markov Model (HMM). The system was able to identify five activities: walking, writing, pointing towards the board, standing and pointing towards presentations with a recognition accuracy of 90%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then morphological features were used to generate fuzzy rules for instructor activities recognition. Such techniques [15,19,20] use spatial data for activity recognition but have ignored temporal information and have had to resort to their own datasets because of the unavailability of standard activ-ity datasets for instructor evaluation. Consequently, there is a need to develop standard datasets for researchers to compare and improve results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%