1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02573473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HNN extensions of semigroups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly the morphism λ i is locally surjective and bijective on the sets of the vertices. Furthermore, M i and N i are approximate automata of SΓ (S[φ, t e ], u) and SΓ (S φ, t , θ 2 (u)), respectively, by Lemma 4.2 (2). Therefore, (P1), (P2) and (P3) are satisfied for i.…”
Section: (53)mentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clearly the morphism λ i is locally surjective and bijective on the sets of the vertices. Furthermore, M i and N i are approximate automata of SΓ (S[φ, t e ], u) and SΓ (S φ, t , θ 2 (u)), respectively, by Lemma 4.2 (2). Therefore, (P1), (P2) and (P3) are satisfied for i.…”
Section: (53)mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The most important property of this construction is that S is naturally embedded into S(φ, t). This is classified as an HNN extension of type I in [14] and the restricted case that the stable letter belongs to the group of units is discussed in [1,2,6,8,9]. This construction is applied to several algorithmic problems like the undecidability of Markov properties of inverse semigroups in [15,18].…”
Section: Presentation S(φ T)mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We now examine the properties of M in some detail. First, we observe that the presentation looks very similar to that of an HNN extension (see [13,26]). Indeed, M is obviously a quotient of the HNN extension with presentation…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 83%