2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2010.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hodgkin–Huxley type modelling and parameter estimation of GnRH neurons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the years, it has seen several modifications and 120 improvements such as the one by Frankenhaeuser and Huxley [16], or the incorporation 121 of additional ion currents [41] given the multitude of ion channel types [42,43]. Also, 122 attempts were made to provide better fits by modifying the exponents of the gating 123 variables [44]. In essence, it is difficult to determine what is the 'right' Hodgkin-Huxley 124 model for specific neuron types.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, it has seen several modifications and 120 improvements such as the one by Frankenhaeuser and Huxley [16], or the incorporation 121 of additional ion currents [41] given the multitude of ion channel types [42,43]. Also, 122 attempts were made to provide better fits by modifying the exponents of the gating 123 variables [44]. In essence, it is difficult to determine what is the 'right' Hodgkin-Huxley 124 model for specific neuron types.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has the benefit, that it can describe subthreshold behavior and the depolarizing phase of AP generation with only an amplifying and a resonant variable, which is the minimal model of excitability. In addition, the number of parameters is significantly lower compared to the case of a detailed conventional Hodgkin-Huxley type model (Csercsik et al, 2010). The tradeoff is that we are not able to handle the appearing voltage gated currents separately (except for the calcium current, as we will see, which has a leading role in the model).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A couple of models have been constructed so far to describe the ionic currents and short term (considering scales of milliseconds) general electrophysiological (Csercsik et al, 2010), and dendritic properties (Roberts et al, 2006;Roberts, Hemond, & Suter, 2008;Roberts et al, 2009) of GnRH neurons based on measurements performed on cells from hypothalamic slices. Other mathematical models (LeBeau *Manuscript Click here to download Manuscript: GnRH_neuron_RR_2_bbl.tex Click here to view linked References 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 2 et Van Goor et al, 2000;Fletcher & Li, 2009) have been proposed to explain experimental data obtained on GT1 cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most treatments of HH parameter estimation have tackled the problem with a focus on practicality-estimating parameters given noisy and limited data. However, there has been relatively little examination [5] of the more basic but essential question of structural identifiability: given perfect, noise-free data, can the parameters in the model be uniquely determined? While such perfect data is of course unrealistic, structural identifiability is a prerequisite for practical identifiability and successful Email addresses: ojwalch@umich.edu (Olivia J. Walch), marisae@umich.edu (Marisa C. Eisenberg) parameter estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%