2013
DOI: 10.14419/gjma.v1i3.938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holder Inequalities for a subclass of univalent functions involving Dziok-Srivastava Operator

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce a new subclasses of univalent functions defined in the open unit disc involving DziokSrivastava Operator . The results on modified Hadamard product ,Holder inequalities and closure properties under integral transforms are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Followed by Nishiwaki et al [11] and Murugusundaramoorthy et al [10] in this section we study some results of Holder type inequalities for f ∈ T J η µ (α, β, γ, A, B). Now we recall the generalisation of the convolution due to Cho et al [5] as given below…”
Section: Holder's Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Followed by Nishiwaki et al [11] and Murugusundaramoorthy et al [10] in this section we study some results of Holder type inequalities for f ∈ T J η µ (α, β, γ, A, B). Now we recall the generalisation of the convolution due to Cho et al [5] as given below…”
Section: Holder's Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Following the works of Murugusundaramoorthy et al [12,13], we discuss integral transformation results for a function f (z) ∈ SI m (ξ, η, δ). Definition 2.…”
Section: Integral Transformation Properties For Class Si M (ξ η δ)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which gives the Komatu operator (for details, see [13]). We now show that the class SI m (ξ, η, δ) is closed under V σ ( f )(z).…”
Section: Integral Transformation Properties For Class Si M (ξ η δ)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that: (i) For p = m = 1, λ = 0 and = 0, we have DF m,p,δ λ, ,γ (α, β, A, B) = HF δ γ (α, β, A, B) (see Murugusundaramoothy et al [11]); (ii) For m = δ = 0, β = γ = B = 1 and A = −1, we have DF 0,p,0 λ, ,γ (α, β, A, B) = S * p (α) , for m = 0 and δ = β = γ = 1, we have DF 0,p,1 λ, ,γ (α, β, A, B) = K p (α) (see also Nishiwaki and Owa [13], with n = 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%