1977
DOI: 10.1049/el:19770473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hole traps in bulk and epitaxial GaAs crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0
17

Year Published

1980
1980
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
51
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…The density of this trap level is two orders of magnitude higher in the GaNAs than in the GaInAs devices. The 0.62 eV hole trap was observed only in the GaInAs devices and is attributed to Fe impurities (4). Composition analysis carried out using secondary-ion mass spectroscopy confirmed the presence of Fe impurities.…”
Section: Dlts Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The density of this trap level is two orders of magnitude higher in the GaNAs than in the GaInAs devices. The 0.62 eV hole trap was observed only in the GaInAs devices and is attributed to Fe impurities (4). Composition analysis carried out using secondary-ion mass spectroscopy confirmed the presence of Fe impurities.…”
Section: Dlts Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The origin of this defect was attributed to a Cu atom [27,28]; however, the absence of Cu in our chemical compound sources makes this origin low probable. For H2, only one hole trap (HT1) with activation energy of 0.22 eV was reported in GaAs grown by vapor phase epitaxy [29]; however, our investigation of lattice defects in GaAsN showed that the activation energy of H2 varies between 0.1 and 0.2 eV, owing to the pool Frenkel emission phenomenon. Furthermore, H2 was confirmed to be a N related acceptor like state, which structure was suggested to be related to the N H bond and Ga vacancy (V Ga ) [7].…”
Section: Hole Traps In Undoped Gaasnmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This value is much lower than those usually published for known hole traps in bulk GaAs 10 as well as the cross section of a single electron ͑10 Ϫ22 cm 2 ͒. Therefore, it is possible that the cross section might be thermally activated, as can be observed by Levinshtein et al 11 Then can be written as ϭ 0 exp(ϪE a /kT) with 0 a prefactor independent on temperature 12,13 and E a the carrier barrier height energy.…”
Section: With a Mean Value Of Of 3ϫ10mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…͑16͒ prevails, this energy has to be ascribed to a thermally activated capture cross section, thus (T)ϭ 0 exp(ϪE a /kT) with 0 a prefactor. 12,13 Since the p ϩϩ -GaAs layer is degenerated, the number of free holes is nearly independent of the temperature. 16 The thermal velocity is proportional to T 1/2 .…”
Section: B Study Of the Time Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%