2019
DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000640
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holistic processing of numerical arrays.

Abstract: At the early stages of concept acquisition, physical properties are inseparable of the concepts they form. With development, the concept seems to depart from the physical entities from which it emerged and seems to exist beyond its physical attributes. Numerosity is an abstract concept; however, physical properties such as diameter, area, and density have been shown to affect its perception in nonsymbolic comparison tasks. It remains unclear how these properties interact with numerosity and which property is m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research over the past two decades has converged on the idea that humans (including infants) and animals have at their disposal a set of analog numerosity (or magnitude) representations, which allows them to estimate and discriminate the numerosity of large sets of items (e.g., dots in a visual display or rapid sequences of sound clicks) without counting (Barth, Kanwisher, & Spelke, 2003 ; Dehaene, Dehaene-Lambertz, & Cohen, 1998 ; Feigenson, Dehaene, & Spelke, 2004 ; Gallistel & Gelman, 2000 ; Katzin, Salti, & Henik, 2018 ; Leibovich & Henik, 2014 ; Nieder, Freedman, & Miller, 2002 ; Nieder & Miller, 2003 ; Piazza, Pinel, Le Bihan, & Dehaene, 2007 ; Whalen, Gallistel, & Gelman, 1999 ). These numerosity representations, also labeled as the approximate number system (ANS), are akin to a “number line,” which is thought to be mediated by broadly tuned numerosity detectors in the parietal cortex (Nieder et al, 2002 ; Nieder & Miller, 2003 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research over the past two decades has converged on the idea that humans (including infants) and animals have at their disposal a set of analog numerosity (or magnitude) representations, which allows them to estimate and discriminate the numerosity of large sets of items (e.g., dots in a visual display or rapid sequences of sound clicks) without counting (Barth, Kanwisher, & Spelke, 2003 ; Dehaene, Dehaene-Lambertz, & Cohen, 1998 ; Feigenson, Dehaene, & Spelke, 2004 ; Gallistel & Gelman, 2000 ; Katzin, Salti, & Henik, 2018 ; Leibovich & Henik, 2014 ; Nieder, Freedman, & Miller, 2002 ; Nieder & Miller, 2003 ; Piazza, Pinel, Le Bihan, & Dehaene, 2007 ; Whalen, Gallistel, & Gelman, 1999 ). These numerosity representations, also labeled as the approximate number system (ANS), are akin to a “number line,” which is thought to be mediated by broadly tuned numerosity detectors in the parietal cortex (Nieder et al, 2002 ; Nieder & Miller, 2003 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, different physical properties are correlated with numerosity and are intercorrelated with one another (Salti, Katzin, Katzin, Leibovich, & Henik, 2017). Two arrays with different numerosities cannot have the same physical properties (Katzin, Salti, & Henik, 2019;Leibovich & Henik, 2013). Therefore, it is impossible to dissociate the physical properties and numerosity of non-symbolic arrays (Gebuis & Reynvoet, 2011;Leibovich et al, 2017;Salti et al, 2017).…”
Section: Numerosity and Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extrinsic properties include density and the convex hull (CH) and consider the locations and sizes of the elements. The CH is the smallest polygon containing all objects in an array with all of its angles less than or equal to 180 degrees (Katzin et al, 2019;Weisstein, 2002). A common way to describe the CH is the shape that emerges if a rubber band is wrapped around the array (Bentley, Kung, Schkolnick, & Thompson, 1978;Day, 1988;Liao, Lu, Ma, Xue, & Yu, 2012).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations